Evaluation of university of florida split-course technique for various head and neck squamous cell carcinomas
โ Scribed by Rodney R. Million; Roland C. Zimmermann
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1975
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 269 KB
- Volume
- 35
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0008-543X
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
A retrospective evaluation was made of 260 patients with squamous carcinoma of various head and neck sites in order to determine the relative value of continuous vs. split-course irradiation techniques. There was no obvious difference in local control or survival in early-stage cases. The continuous technique resulted in a better local control and survival rate in moderately advanced and advanced stages. Complications were less severe in the split-course cases.
Cancer 35 : 15 33 -1 536, 1 9 75.
H E THERAPEUTIC RESULTS OF SPLIT-COURSE
T fractionation schemes for head and neck cancer have been reported by several 2tUthors,2.4.5.7-11 T h e split-course technique is used today in a variety of forms by many practitioners of radiation therapy. Therefore, a retrospective analysis was made to compare continuous and split-course techniques used for curative treatment in various squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck M A T E R I A 1 3 Treatment region. AND METHODS Two techniques, continuous and split-course, have been used to irradiate head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Both groups were I'resented at thc 16th .\nnu;il XleetinT of the i\merican ,Swirty 01 'l'herapeutic R~~lioloqists, Key Biscayne, FL,, O ctotier 30LN1iwmber 3. 1974. 1:roni thc Llnivrrsitv of Florida College of hledicine, (;.iinesville. PI. * Ilircctor. I)ivision nl Radiation 'I'herapy, and American (:iiiicer Society Ed (:. \riqht Xlernorial Professor in Clinical ()nc(iloqy. ' Presently Instructor in Radiation Oncology, Loma I .irida L'niversity hledical Center. Loma Linda, CA. While uiidwtakinq this research project I l r Zimrnermann was a \ isitinq rcsident at the Llnivrrsity of Florida Division 01 ld.ndiation 'l'herapy and was partly supported b y a n Anirrican (:ancer Society Clinical Fellowship.
']'lie ;authors wish to expwss their gratitude to 1h.Jaii M'. hu7m.i of r i t r 1)eparttnent of Miostatistics, and 1 0 rhc Sc ten-[ i l l ( (:~itnli~tt;iti~ins (:enter, Loma Linda Llnt\wrsiry. I.orn;t I itid;. (:., l o r [heir help with t h e statistical an;il)si> ~ireseiitrd in this piper. .\ddress for reprints I<odney K . Xlillion~ 111). l)ivisic~n 01 Ibidiat ion 'I'hrrapy. C'niversity of Florida Chllege 01 Xledicinr. (;ainesville. FL 32610.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
Forty-two patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck were treated with vinblastine, bleomycin, and cisplatin. All patients had received prior surgery, radiation or chemotherapy and all had measurable disease. Forty-five percent of the patients responded with a
Background. Debate continues over the management of the N0 neck in head and neck malignancy. Therefore, the possibility of performing sentinel node biopsy in these patients was investigated to formulate a method for the procedure. Methods. Patients undergoing prophylactic or therapeutic neck dissec
Background. Prognosis of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is strongly associated with cervical lymph node metastasis. Cathepsin-D is a lysosomal protease expressed in all cells. Its role in extracellular matrix degradation is postulated to promote tumor invasion and metastasis. Increase
## Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the modern diagnostic evaluation for squamous cell carcinoma metastatic to cervical lymph nodes from an unknown head and neck primary site. ## Methods: One hundred thirty patients were evaluated between june 1983 and june 19