𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Evaluation of toxicity and antitumor activity of cycloviolacin O2 in mice

✍ Scribed by Robert Burman; Erika Svedlund; Jenny Felth; Saadia Hassan; Anders Herrmann; Richard J. Clark; David J. Craik; Lars Bohlin; Per Claeson; Ulf Göransson; Joachim Gullbo


Publisher
Wiley (John Wiley & Sons)
Year
2010
Tongue
English
Weight
265 KB
Volume
94
Category
Article
ISSN
0006-3525

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Cycloviolacin O2 is a small cyclic cysteine‐rich protein belonging to the group of plant proteins called cyclotides. This cyclotide has been previously shown to exert cytotoxic activity against a variety of human tumor cell lines as well as primary cultures of human tumor cells in vitro. This study is the first evaluation of its tolerability and antitumor activity in vivo. Maximal‐tolerated doses were estimated to 1.5 mg/kg for single intravenous (i.v.) dosing and 0.5 mg/kg for daily repeated dosing, respectively. Two different in vivo methods were used: the hollow fiber method with single dosing (i.v. 1.0 mg/kg) and traditional xenografts with repeated dosing over 2 weeks (i.v. 0.5 mg/kg daily, 5 days a week). The human tumor cell lines used displayed dose‐dependent in vitro sensitivity (including growth in hollow fibers to confirm passage of cycloviolacin O2 through the polyvinylidene fluoride fibers), with IC~50~ values in the micromolar range. Despite this sensitivity in vitro, no significant antitumor effects were detected in vivo, neither with single dosing in the hollow fiber method nor with repeated dosing in xenografts. In summary, the results indicate that antitumor effects are minor or absent at tolerable (sublethal) doses, and cycloviolacin O2 has a very abrupt in vivo toxicity profile, with lethality after single injection at 2 mg/kg, but no signs of discomfort to the animals at 1.5 mg/kg. Repeated dosing of 1 mg/kg gave a local‐inflammatory reaction at the site of injection after 2–3 days; lower doses were without complications. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Biopolymers (Pept Sci) 94: 626–634, 2010.

This article was originally published online as an accepted preprint. The “Published Online” date corresponds to the preprint version. You can request a copy of the preprint by emailing the Biopolymers editorial office at [email protected]


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Developmental toxicity evaluation of emo
✍ Gloria D. Jahnke; Catherine J. Price; Melissa C. Marr; Christina B. Myers; Julia 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 142 KB 👁 2 views

## Abstract **BACKGROUND:** Emodin, a widely available herbal remedy, was evaluated for potential effects on pregnancy outcome. **METHODS:** Emodin was administered in feed to timed‐mated Sprague–Dawley (CD) rats (0, 425, 850, and 1700 ppm; gestational day [GD] 6–20), and Swiss Albino (CD‐1) mice (

Developmental toxicity evaluation of inh
✍ Frank Welsch; Barbara Elswick; R. Arden James; Melissa C. Marr; Christina B. Mye 📂 Article 📅 2003 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 105 KB

This evaluation was part of a much more comprehensive testing program to characterize the mammalian toxicity potential of the gasoline oxygenator additive tertiary amyl methyl ether (TAME), and was initiated upon a regulatory agency mandate. A developmental toxicity hazard identification study was c