## Abstract The effectiveness of three methods (Campbell and Wilkin,^6^ Warsof,^3^ Warsof et al^4^) for estimating fetal weight from measurements of the abdominal circumference (AC) and biparietal diameter (BPD) has been evaluated in 125 patients studied with dynamic image ultrasound. Investigation
Evaluation of three methods for estimating fetal weight
โ Scribed by Lyndon M. Hill; Robert Breckle; Kim R. Wolfgram; Peter C. O'Brien
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1986
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 675 KB
- Volume
- 14
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0091-2751
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
Three ultrasonic methods for estimating fetal weight (Campbell, Warsof, and Shepard) were compared in 124 singleton pregnancies. Fetal abdominal circumference was obtained by use of a map measurer and from diameter measurements and the equation for the circumference of a circle. Campbell's formula for estimating fetal weight was superior between 2,000 and 4,000 g, whereas Shepard's method was slightly better below 2,000 g and over 4,000 g. Hence, varied fetal anthropometric characteristics make it mandatory that several methods be evaluated by each institution before one is selected. With the methods of Campbell and Shepard, use of diameter measurements and the equation for the circumference of a circle resulted in a more accurate estimated fetal weight than when a map measurer was used.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
A prospective study was conducted to evaluate the estimation of fetal weight in preterm pregnancies by use of ultrasound measurements. Two equations for estimating fetal weight, one proposed by Shepard and associates and the other by Hadlock and associates, were evaluated. The ability to estimate fe
## Abstract Birth weight (BW) and log~10~ birth weight (LBW) are expressed as linear, multilinear, parabolic, and polynomial regression functions of the abdominal circumference (AC), and combinations of fetal index measurements, namely, AC and head circumference (HC); biparietal diameter (BPD) and
In this investigation the weight estimation procedure of Rossavik was reassessed with particular emphasis on parameter estimation and performance over a wide weight range. Using a cross-sectional data set (193 patients), a longitudinal data set (20 patients), and an iterative procedure, parameter es
Six published fetal weight estimating regression models proposed for clinical use were evaluated in 259 pregnant women who delivered within 72 h of an ultrasound evaluation performed with sector scanner. The patient sample included 89 (33.2%) fetal weights that were below the 10th or above the 90th
The accuracy of the instrumental variable approach to parameter estimation (also called correlation analysis) can be significantly improved by optimally weighting the estimating equations. However, the optimal weight in general depends on unknown quantities and hence must be itself estimated before