๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Evaluation of three antidotes on arsenic toxicity in the common earthworm (Lumbricus terrestris)

โœ Scribed by Wei Li; Paul K. Chien; Arthur Furst


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1994
Tongue
English
Weight
289 KB
Volume
14
Category
Article
ISSN
0260-437X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


The common earthworm (Lumbricus terrestris) is being evaluated in our laboratories as a substitute for mice in metal toxicity studies. These two disparate species have enzymes in common, such as catalase, superoxide dismutase and glutathione-Stransferase. Also, worms respond similarly to these rodents for selenium and nickel toxicity. Worms are less sensitive, however, to metal toxicity. In this study earthworms were challenged with three different arsenic compounds: arsenite, arsenate and the vesicant phenyldichloroarsine (PDA). The median lethal dose for each arsenic compound was determined. The order of toxicity of the arsenic compounds to the worms was PDA > arsenite > arsenate (24 h LD~,, values were 189.5, 191.0 and 519.4 pmol kg-', respectively). Individual mammalian dithiol antidotes, namely the sodium salt of 2,fdimercapto-l-propanesulfonic acid (DMPS), mesedimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) or 2,3-dimercapto-l-propanol (BAL), were injected into the worms 5 min after various doses of the arsenic compound were administered. The decreases in acute toxicity values were recorded. All three antidotes protected the worms against arsenic toxicity with varying degrees of effectiveness. The protective action for the inorganic arsenic compounds was in the order DMPS > DMSA > BAL. For the organic arsenical, PDA, the most effective antidote was BAL.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Edaphic factors affecting the toxicity a
โœ Andrew A. Meharg; Richard F. Shore; Kirsten Broadgate ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1998 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 103 KB

## Abstract The toxicity and accumulation of arsenate was determined in the earthworm __Lumbricus terrestris__ in soil from different layers of a forest profile. Toxicity increased fourfold between 2 and 10 d. Edaphic factors (pH, soil organic matter, and depth in soil profile) also affected toxici