𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Evaluation of the S phase distribution of flow cytometric DNA histograms by autoradiography and computer algorithms

✍ Scribed by L. E. Sheck; K. A. Muirhead; P. K. Horan

Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1980
Tongue
English
Weight
751 KB
Volume
1
Category
Article
ISSN
0196-4763

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

S-phase fraction assessed by a variant o
S-phase fraction assessed by a variant of the rectangular model adapted to the flow-cytometric DNA histogram profile
✍ Olle StΓ₯l; Bo Baldetorp πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1998 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 68 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Measurement of S-phase fraction by DNA flow cytometry is widely used in the analysis of human tumors. The calculation of fraction of S-phase cells is performed either by means of curve-fitting techniques or by more simple planimetric methods. Estimates by the latter often suffer from subjectivi

Can flow cytometrically determined DNA p
Can flow cytometrically determined DNA ploidy and S-phase fraction predict regional metastasis in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity?
✍ Ryoichi Oya; Kunio Ikemura πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2002 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 88 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract ## Background The value of flow cytometric analysis of DNA ploidy and S‐phase fraction (SPF) as an indicator of regional metastasis in oral cancer is currently being debated. Intratumoral heterogeneity makes this problem complex. ## Methods Intratumoral DNA ploidy heterogeneity and i

Prognostic implications of different cel
Prognostic implications of different cell cycle analysis models of flow cytometric DNA histograms of 1,301 breast cancer patients: Results from the multicenter morphometric mammary carcinoma project (MMMCP)
✍ Elisabeth Bergers; Jan P.A. Baak; Paul J. van Diest; Leo H.M. van Gorp; Wien S. πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1997 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 French βš– 100 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

Conflicting prognostic results with regard to DNA flow cytometric cell cycle variables have been reported for breast cancer patients. An important reason for this may be related to differences in the interpretation of DNA histograms. Several computer programs based on different cell cycle fitting mo