Different methods of expressing the results of the aminopyrine COz breath test (ABT) were compared to determine the method that would be most sensitive for evaluating liver function. The patient population included healthy controls (n = 22); patients with mild (4), moderate (9), and severe (7) alcoh
Evaluation of the results of three different methods of postmastectomy lymphedema treatment
β Scribed by R. Zanolla; C. Monzeglio; A. Balzarini; G. Martino
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1984
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 256 KB
- Volume
- 26
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0022-4790
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
The aim of this study was to evaluate the following methods of postmastectomy lymphedema treatment: pneumatic massage with uniform pressure, pneumatic massage with differentiated pressure, and manual lymphatic massage. The study concerned three groups of 20 mastectomized patients with secondary early developed arm lymphedema. The measurement of circumference on seven points of both arms, the selfscoring mood questionnaire, and the visual analogue scale (VAS) were evaluated before, at the end, and 3 months after the treatment. We observed a permanent edema reduction, which was statistically significant, with uniform pressure pneumatic massage and with manual lymphatic massage, but not with differentiated pneumatic massage. The VAS and the self-scoring mood questionnaire made from measuring the subjective ratings of the patients confirmed the objective evaluations.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
This paper gives an outline of the Casley-Smith method for the treatment of lymphedema of the arm. It includes a brief summary of the development of manual techniques and the terminology applied to them. ## METHODS. The four principles of this method are skin care, manual lymphatic drainage, compr
## Abstract __Background__: Published guidelines on the conduct of economic evaluations provide little guidance regarding the use and potential bias of the different costing methods. __Objectives__: Using microcosting and two grossβcosting methods, we (1) compared the cost estimates within and acr