Evaluation of the ERETIC method as an improved quantitative reference for 1H HR-MAS spectroscopy of prostate tissue

✍ Scribed by Mark J. Albers; Thomas N. Butler; Iman Rahwa; Nguyen Bao; Kayvan R. Keshari; Mark G. Swanson; John Kurhanewicz

• Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
• Year: 2009
• Tongue: English
• Weight: 285 KB
• Volume: 61
• Category: Article
• ISSN: 0740-3194
• DOI: 10.1002/mrm.21808

✦ Synopsis

Abstract

The Electronic REference To access In vivo Concentrations (ERETIC) method was applied to ^1^H HR‐MAS spectroscopy. The accuracy, precision, and stability of ERETIC as a quantitative reference were evaluated in solution and human prostate tissue samples. For comparison, the reliability of 3‐(trimethylsilyl)propionic‐2,2,3,3‐d~4~ acid (TSP) as a quantitation reference was also evaluated. The ERETIC and TSP peak areas were found to be stable in solution over the short‐term and long‐term, with long‐term relative standard deviations (RSDs) of 4.10% and 2.60%, respectively. Quantification of TSP in solution using the ERETIC peak as a reference and a calibrated, rotor‐dependent conversion factor yielded results with a precision ≤2.9% and an accuracy error ≤4.2% when compared with the expected values. The ERETIC peak area reproducibility was superior to TSP's reproducibility, corrected for mass, in both prostate surgical and biopsy samples (4.53% vs. 21.2% and 3.34% vs. 31.8%, respectively). Furthermore, the tissue TSP peaks exhibited only 27.5% of the expected area, which would cause an overestimation of metabolite concentrations if used as a reference. The improved quantification accuracy and precision provided by ERETIC may enable the detection of smaller metabolic differences that may exist between individual tissue samples and disease states. Magn Reson Med 61:525–532, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.