𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Evaluation of KIc depending on sample size for ceramics

✍ Scribed by Bao Yiwang; Jin Zongzhe; Li Xiaorui


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1994
Tongue
English
Weight
445 KB
Volume
48
Category
Article
ISSN
0013-7944

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Ahatrac-The functional relationships between fracture toughness and sample size, and between fracture strength and sample size, for single-edge-notched-beam (SENB) specimens were derived. Experiments for size. effects of fracture toughness on Al,O, and Si,N, ceramics were carried out, and the results were identical with the theoretical ones. It is pointed out that the size effects of K,,, the size requirement as well as the requirement of proportional specimens are derived from the calculation formula of fracture toughness. The formula is invalid when the size of specimens used is smaller than the critical size. Theoretical and experimental results indicate that, under the critical size, fracture toughness size has a peak value which is about 20% higher than the real toughness value. The larger the specimen, the more reliable and more stable the measured toughness value. This study presents a useful means for error analysis of K,, measurement and for the evaluation of reliability of structural ceramics.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Sample size considerations for the evalu
✍ Claudia Schmoor; Willi Sauerbrei; Martin Schumacher πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2000 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 103 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

When the role of a new prognostic factor is investigated, careful planning of an appropriate study is required. This includes an assessment of the power of the study in terms of sample sizes. An adequate analysis of the independent prognostic e!ect of a new factor has to be adjusted for the existing

Evaluation of Noether's Method of Sample
✍ Dr. RΓΌdiger Vollandt; Dr. Manfred Horn πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1997 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 369 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

## Abstract NOETHER (1987) proposed a method of sample size determination for the Wilcoxon‐Mann‐Whitney test. To obtain a sample size formula, he restricted himself to alternatives that differ only slightly from the null hypothesis, so that the unknown variance o^2^ of the Mann‐Whitney statistic ca