## Abstract This report describes a Glycemic Control Program instituted at an academic regional levelβone trauma center. Key interventions included: 1) development of a subcutaneous insulin physician order set, 2) use of a realβtime data report to identify patients with outβofβrange glucoses, and 3
Evaluation of glycemic control following discontinuation of an intensive insulin protocol
β Scribed by Quinn A. Czosnowski; Joseph M. Swanson; Bob L. Lobo; Joyce E. Broyles; Paul R. Deaton; Christopher K. Finch
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2009
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 116 KB
- Volume
- 4
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1553-5592
- DOI
- 10.1002/jhm.393
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
BACKGROUND: Intensive insulin protocols (IIPs) have been demonstrated to reduce morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients. Currently, there are no published studies evaluating glycemic control after discontinuation of an IIP.
OBJECTIVE:
The purpose of this study was to compare blood glucose (BG) control during an IIP and for 5 days following its discontinuation (follow-up period).
METHODS:
The study was a retrospective review of intensive care unit patients who received an IIP for !24 hours. Data were collected during the last 12 hours of the IIP and subsequent follow-up period.
RESULTS: For all 65 included patients, the mean AE standard deviation for BG on the IIP was 123 AE 26 mg/dL versus 168 AE 50 mg/dL following discontinuation of the IIP (P < 0.001). The median (interquartile range) insulin that was administered decreased from 40 (22-65) units on the IIP to 8 (0-18) units after the IIP was stopped (P < 0.001). The mean daily BG during the follow-up period was significantly higher than that during the IIP (P < 0.001). Additionally, an insulin requirement of >20 units during the last 12 hours of the IIP was identified as a risk factor for poor glycemic control during the follow-up period (odds ratio: 4.62; 95% confidence interval: 1.17-18.17).
CONCLUSIONS:
This study demonstrates a significant increase in BG following discontinuation of an IIP. Higher insulin requirements during the last 12 hours of an IIP were identified as an independent risk factor for poor glycemic control following the IIP. A standardized insulin transition protocol may help better control BG after discontinuation of an IIP.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract ## BACKGROUND: Structured subcutaneous insulin order sets and insulin protocols are widely advocated. The intervention effects are not well reported. ## OBJECTIVE: Assess the impact of these interventions on insulin use patterns, hypoglycemia, and glycemic control. ## DESIGN: Prosp
## Abstract ## BACKGROUND: Hypoglycemia during insulin infusion therapy is a major problem. We investigated whether a delay in blood glucose (BG) monitoring during an insulin infusion protocol (IIP) in the intensive care unit (ICU) is associated with hypoglycemia. ## METHODS: Data were collected
In January 1985, a single protocol consisting of cyclophosphamide, vincristine, tetrahydropyranyl adriamycin, and cis-platinum for the treatment of advanced neuroblastoma was begun nationwide in Japan and was found to improve clinical results significantly in terms of 2-or 3year survival rate. Betw