Several global optimization algorithms were applied to the problem of molecular docking: random walk and Metropolis Monte Carlo Simulated Annealing as references, and Stochastic Approximation with Smoothing (SAS), and Terminal Repeller Unconstrained Subenergy Tunneling (TRUST) as new methodologies.
Evaluation of global optimization algorithms for parameter calibration of a computationally intensive hydrologic model
β Scribed by Xuesong Zhang; Raghavan Srinivasan; Kaiguang Zhao; Mike Van Liew
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2009
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 327 KB
- Volume
- 23
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0885-6087
- DOI
- 10.1002/hyp.7152
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Abstract
With the popularity of complex hydrologic models, the time taken to run these models is increasing substantially. Comparing and evaluating the efficacy of different optimization algorithms for calibrating computationally intensive hydrologic models is becoming a nontrivial issue. In this study, five global optimization algorithms (genetic algorithms, shuffled complex evolution, particle swarm optimization, differential evolution, and artificial immune system) were tested for automatic parameter calibration of a complex hydrologic model, Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT), in four watersheds. The results show that genetic algorithms (GA) outperform the other four algorithms given model evaluation numbers larger than 2000, while particle swarm optimization (PSO) can obtain better parameter solutions than other algorithms given fewer number of model runs (less than 2000). Given limited computational time, the PSO algorithm is preferred, while GA should be chosen given plenty of computational resources. When applying GA and PSO for parameter optimization of SWAT, small population size should be chosen. Copyright Β© 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract Land surface schemes (LSSs) represent the interface between land surface and the atmosphere in general circulation models (GCMs). Errors in LSSβsimulated heat and moisture fluxes can result from inadequate representation of hydrological features and the derivation of effective surface p