๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Evaluation of cortical bone by computed tomography

โœ Scribed by Thomas N. Hangartner; Vicente Gilsanz


Publisher
American Society for Bone and Mineral Research
Year
2009
Tongue
English
Weight
772 KB
Volume
11
Category
Article
ISSN
0884-0431

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the minimum thickness of cortical bone required for the accurate measurement of cortical material density by computed tomography (CT) and to establish normal reference values. A phantom with several wall thicknesses of boneโ€like material was constructed to simulate various cortical widths. The CT density at each level of thickness was measured on a GE 9800 CT scanner and on the OsteoQuant, a special CT scanner optimized for the measurement of bone in the extremities. The minimum width required to attain the correct material density was determined for each scanner. Additionally, the material density and width of the cortex in the radius and/or femur were measured by CT in 761 healthy subjects, ages 4โ€84 years. The minimum thickness necessary for an accurate density evaluation of the walls of the phantom by CT was 2โ€2.5 mm; below these thresholds the values fell in a linear way relative to width. In humans, the material density of cortical bone in the appendicular skeleton was not influenced by height or weight, and the values were similar for all subjects, as long as the cortical width was above 2โ€2.5 mm. The cortical width increased with age up to 30 years and decreased from 50 years on. We conclude that the material density of cortical bone in the appendicular skeleton can be measured accurately by CT if the thickness of the cortex exceeds 2โ€2.5 mm.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Quantification of cortical bone loss and
โœ Kai H. Barck; Wyne P. Lee; Lauri J. Diehl; Jed Ross; Peter Gribling; Yifan Zhang ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2004 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 368 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

## Abstract ## Objective Ex vivo and in vivo microโ€“computed tomography (microโ€CT) combined with a novel image analysis algorithm were used to quantify cortical bone loss and periosteal new bone formation for therapeutic evaluation in a murine model of collagenโ€induced arthritis. ## Methods An au

Estimation of mechanical properties of c
โœ Susan M. Snyder; Dr. Erich Schneider ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1991 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 898 KB

## Abstract It is difficult to assess from conventional xโ€rays the amount of loading that a bone can tolerate. The question therefore was asked whether the mechanical properties of cortical bone could be estimated by using a computed tomography (CT) system typically employed in the clinical setting

High resolution computed tomography in e
โœ Swartz, Joel D. ;Russell, Kamal B. ;Wolfson, Robert J. ;Marlowe, Frank I. ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1984 ๐Ÿ› Wiley (John Wiley & Sons) โš– 579 KB

## Abstract High resolution computed tomography has completely replaced conventional multidirectional tomography in the evaluation of the temporal bone. Unprecedented detail is now available for evaluation of both middle ear and inner ear structures. A sampling of our experience in the evaluation o

Evaluation of cervical cancer by compute
โœ Harpreet K. Pannu; Elliot K. Fishman ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2003 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 76 KB

In the evaluation of cervical cancer, computed tomography (CT) is used primarily to stage advanced tumors and evaluate for recurrence. Because of reports that CT imaging lacks sensitivity and specificity in the detection of primary tumors and metastatic lesions, its use in these applications has bee

Temporal bone anatomy: Comparison of com
โœ Shaffer, Katherine A. ;Littleton, Jesse T. ;Durizch, Mary Lou ;Callahan, William ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1982 ๐Ÿ› Wiley (John Wiley & Sons) โš– 347 KB

## Abstract Specially reconstructed 1.5โ€mm thick CT scans and complex motion tomograms of the temporal bones were compared with anatomic sections of the same bones. Computed tomography demonstrated sloping bone surfaces and soft tissues better than tomography, whereas standard complex motion tomogr