## Abstract ## BACKGROUND The purpose of the study was to assess the efficacy and toxicity of carboplatin and paclitaxel administered every 3 weeks in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma, previously treated with cisplatinβbased therapy. ## METHODS Eligibility included metastatic or local
Evaluation of cisplatin, carboplatin, and etoposide in metastatic nonsmall cell lung carcinoma: A phase II study of the Southwest Oncology Group
β Scribed by Robert A. Figlin; John J. Crowley; Edwin L. Jacobs; Michael Muirhead; John Wendall Goodwin; John J. Rinehart; Robert B. Livingston
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1996
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 587 KB
- Volume
- 78
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0008-543X
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
BACKGROUND.
The combined use of cisplatin and carboplatin chemotherapy offers a unique means of platinum dose intensification. Response rates using either of these agents in combination with etoposide are comparable. In a Phase II trial, the authors investigated the combination of cisplatin and carhoplatin with etoposide for the treatment of patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma. METHODS. Eligible patients were chemotherapy naive and had histologically confirmed. evaluable, or measurable selected Stage IIIB and Stage IV nonsmall cell lung carcinoma. Based upon the results of an earlier Phase I and I1 pilot study, patients received carboplatin, 225 mg/m2, on Day 1; cisplatin, 50 mglm', on Days 2 and 3 ; and etoposide, 75 mg/m', on Days 1, 2, and 3 every-4-weeks. RESULTS. Eighty-three patients (75 eligible patients) received chemotherapy with cisplatin, carboplatin, and etoposide. Two patients refused therapy after registration and were n'ot analyzable. Thirty-six of the remaining 75 patients had Grade 4 toxicities, mostly hematologic, and 6 patients died of toxicity. The confirmed response rate was 24% (95% confidence interval, 1 5 3 5 % ) . Median progressionfree survival was 4 months and the median survival was 8 months. CONCLUSIONS. Combination cisplatin, carboplatin. and etopvside chemotherapy appears to be no better than cisplatinletoposide or carboplatinletoposide for the treatment of patiients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma. The toxicity of this regimen may be higher, and therefore it cannot be recommended For general use.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Background: Patients with metastatic nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (nsclc) usually have a poor prognosis. a chemotherapy regimen containing cisplatin is commonly used for symptom palliation. echinomycin is a potent bifunctional intercalator of double-strand dna; trimetrexate is a new derivative o
## Background: A previous southwest oncology group study demonstrated a 30% response rate with the combination of cisplatin and mitotane in the treatment of patients with metastatic adrenocortical carcinoma. several case reports suggested that the combination of etoposide and cisplatin may be an ac
## Background: The authors designed this randomized, controlled trial to assess whether dose intensification of a cisplatin-etoposide combination (pe), achieved by shortening the interval between chemotherapy cycles, would improve response rate and survival. the maximum tolerated dose of pe was adm