๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Evaluation of a metaphase chromosome finder: Potential application to chromosome-based radiation dosimetry

โœ Scribed by J.R.N. McLean; F. Johnson


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1995
Tongue
English
Weight
421 KB
Volume
26
Category
Article
ISSN
0968-4328

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


An automated metaphase chromosome finder is described which combines a microscope, state-of-the-art computer technology and a simple decision-making algorithm. A microscope slide is systematically scanned under computer control and the location of each positive 'signal' placed into memory for later recall and review by a human operator. The software identifies two events, positives (the presence of a 'signal') and negatives (the absence of a 'signal'). The performance of the metaphase finder was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. At the optimum decision threshold, the detection rates for true positives (metaphase spreads) was about 74%, false positives (type I error) about 6%, and false negatives (type II error) about 26%. The overall accuracy, which accounts for differences in the sensitivity of the detector to positive and negative events, was 89.4% (+/- 0.01%; standard error of the mean, n = 8). Potential applications to radiation dosimetry are discussed.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Isolation of DNA sequences on human chro
โœ Umadevi Tantravahi; Gordon D. Stewart; Margaret Keuren; Gerard McNeil; Sayon Roy ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1988 ๐Ÿ› Springer ๐ŸŒ English โš– 720 KB

By merging two efficient technologies, bivariate flow sorting of human metaphase chromosomes and a recombination-based assay for sequence complexity, we isolated 28 cloned DNA segments homologous to loci on human chromosome 21. Subregional mapping of these DNA segments with a somatic cell hybrid pan

Clarification to: Evaluation of a whole-
๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2003 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 41 KB

## Abstract The original article to which this Clarification refers was published in Genes, Chromosomes, and Cancer (2003) 38(2) 168โ€“176