Evaluation and Experiment. Some Critical Issues in Assessing Social Programs
โ Scribed by Carl A. Bennett and Arthur A. Lumsdaine (Eds.)
- Publisher
- Academic Press
- Year
- 1975
- Tongue
- English
- Leaves
- 558
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Table of Contents
Content:
QUANTITATIVE STUDIES IN SOCIAL RELATIONS, Page ii
Front Matter, Page iii
Inside Front Cover, Page iv
Copyright, Page iv
Preface, Pages xi-xiii
Acknowledgments, Pages xv-xvi
1 - Social Program Evaluation: Definitions and Issues, Pages 1-38, CARL A. BENNETT, ARTHUR A. LUMSDAINE
2 - Assessing Social Innovations: An Empirical Base for Policy, Pages 39-193, JOHN P. GILBERT, RICHARD J. LIGHT, FREDERICK MOSTELLER
3 - Making the Case for Randomized Assignment to Treatments by Considering the Alternatives: Six Ways in Which Quasi-Experimental Evaluations In Compensatory Education Tend to Underestimate Effects, Pages 195-296, DONALD P. CAMPBELL, ROBERT F. BORUCH
4 - Regression and Selection Models to Improve Nonexperimental Comparisons, Pages 297-317, GLEN G. CAIN
5 - Field Trial Designs in Gauging the Impact of Fertility Planning Programs, Pages 319-408, ELIZABETH T. HILTON, ARTHUR A. LUMSDAINE
6 - Experiments and Evaluations: A Reexamination, Pages 409-463, WARD EDWARDS, MARCIA GUTTENTAG
7 - Feedback in Social Systems: Operational and Systemic Research on Production, Maintenance, Control, and Adaptive Functions, Pages 465-523, DANIEL KATZ
8 - Assessing Alternative Conceptions of Evaluation, Pages 525-553, ARTHUR A. LUMSDAINE, CARL A. BENNETT
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
xxi, 152 p. ; 24 cm
<p><script type='text/javascript"' src="http://books.google.com/books/previewlib.js"></script><script type="text/javascript">GBS_insertPreviewButtonPopup('ISBN:9780748615629);</script></p> <p>This book explores key areas of modern society in which language is used to form power and social relations.
<p>During the past two decades, evaluation has come to play an increasingly important role in the operation of educational and social programs by national, state, and local agencies. Mandates by federal funding agencies that programs they sponsored be evaluated gave impetus to use of evaluation. Rea