Evaluating focus theories for dialogue management
✍ Scribed by RENAUD LECŒUCHE; DAVE ROBERTSON; CATHERINE BARRY; CHRIS MELLISH
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 2000
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 413 KB
- Volume
- 52
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1071-5819
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Interactive reasoning tools are usually driven by an agenda of tasks to perform, rather than by conventions of human dialogue. On the other hand, theories of dialogue in natural language tend to ignore the constraints imposed by reasoning tools. This paper presents a system composed of a reasoning module and a dialogue manager which cooperate to produce dialogues that are suitable for reasoning and follow human dialogue conventions. The dialogue manager is driven by focus rules. Various competing focus theories exist but there have been few comparative studies of their use in non-trivial tasks. We make a comparative study of the use of focus theories, which requires us to be precise about our interpretation of our chosen focus theories, and to develop an innovative means of empirical testing for them. We evaluate the theories on an example of combined dialogue and reasoning from the domain of requirements elicitation.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
Diagnostic evaluation is an important instrument for the development of high-quality spoken language dialogue systems. Yet no rigorous methodology exists for the systematic and exhaustive diagnostic evaluation of all aspects of spoken language interaction: recognition, synthesis, grammar, vocabulary
When a lack of bench strength for top leadership roles became a serious obstacle to execution of its new business strategy, Johns Manville had to move rapidly. It put in place new processes and tools for identifying and aggressively developing high-potential talent-at the same time requiring that ma