Etiologic and prevention effectiveness intervention studies in occupational health
β Scribed by Torsten Skov; Tage S. Kristensen
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1996
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 371 KB
- Volume
- 29
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0271-3586
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
hi this article a hasic distinction is made between etiologic and prevention ejfectiveness intervention studies. Etiologic intervention studies ,focus on elucidating causes of disease, while the purpose q f preL,ention effectiveness intervention studies is to study methods of prevention. The design requirements ,for each ?f these studie.y are veni different: etiologic intervention studies usually need large study populations, large exposure contrasts, ascertainment of exposure, as well as health outcome. Idecrlly, randomization und blinding should also be applied. Effective preventive strategies may, on the other hand, be identified in small study populations with exposure as the only outcome measure, and randomization and blinding incry be .superfluous. At present, intervention studies are in great demand. arid ofen there is a wish that eriologic questions as well as prevention effectiveness be uddressed in the .same study. We argue that this should not be done without careful consideration O f possible conflicting design aspects.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract ## Background A planning model was used to guide the design of a randomized controlled study of the effectiveness of tailored interventions in lowering dust exposures in small woodworking shops. ## Methods Guided by Green's PRECEDEβPROCEED model, we used a planning committee, focus g
In the following papers, authors conducting intervention research in the agricultural, manufacturing, health care, or construction industries present case studies to exemplify a number of methodological issues that are of concern during the preintervention planning and post-intervention follow-up ph