In metaethics, there is a divide between those who believe that there exist moral facts independently of human interests and attitudes (i.e., moral realists) and those who donβt (i.e., antirealists). In the last half century, the field of religious ethics has been inundated with various antirealist
ethics and metaethics
- Tongue
- English
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
<span>This Element presents an interpretation and defence of Philippa Foot's ethical naturalism. It begins with the often neglected grammatical method that Foot derives from an interpretation of Ludwig Wittgenstein's later philosophy. This method shapes her approach to understanding goodness as well
<p><span>The Futility of Philosophical Ethics</span><span> puts forward a novel account of the grounds of moral feeling with fundamental implications for philosophical ethics. It examines the grounds of moral feeling by both the phenomenology of that feeling, and the facts of moral feeling in operat
The Futility of Philosophical Ethics puts forward a novel account of the grounds of moral feeling with fundamental implications for philosophical ethics. It examines the grounds of moral feeling by both the phenomenology of that feeling, and the facts of moral feeling in operation β particularly in
If human biological evolution is part of our worldview, then how do commonplace notions of ethics fit in? To ask the question, βwhat does evolution imply about ethics?β we must first be clear about what we mean by evolution. Evolution and the Foundations of Ethics discusses four models of evolution,