Ethical cautions in the use of outcomes for resource allocation in the managed care environment of mental health
β Scribed by Douglas P. Olsen
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1995
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 504 KB
- Volume
- 9
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1532-8228
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Increasingly, resources are being allocated through competitive contracting based on outcome data. This context for outcome research renews ethical concern about the nature of outcome data in the field of mental health. The epis-temolo~ of mental illness creates special concerns regarding outcome measurement. Ethical cautions specific to six types of outcome measurement are reviewed: utilization, clinician reports, patient reports, objective measures of diagnostic entities, objective measures of functioning and multifactor research.
Brief guidelines are offered for addressing ethical cautions. Also discussed are the difficulty in defining good outcomes and a social obligation to future generations that may be better addressed through process measurements.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Objective: To describe the key features of the βBetter Outcomes in Mental Health Careβ initiative (2001-2005) and to detail some of the conceptual, community, professional and epidemiological forces that shaped its content. Conclusions: The βBetter Outcomes in Mental Health Careβ initiative repre
## Background: Recent proposals to reform cost-effectiveness analysis (cea) by weighting health benefits [(quality-adjusted life-years) qalys] by recipients' age are based on studies examining age-related preferences in life-saving contexts. we investigated whether the perceived importance of age i
The paper uses new and detailed data from a population sample of individuals with arthritis to examine the impact of objective measures of need for treatment and individual measures of socio-economic position on the distribution of public and private health care. The quality of the data and the rang
## Abstract __Background__: An analytical framework using Bayesian decision theory and valueβofβinformation analysis has recently been advocated for the economic evaluation of health technologies. The purpose of this study was to apply this framework to screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA)