๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Estimation of sampling variance of molecular marker data using the bootstrap procedure

โœ Scribed by J. G. Tivang; J. Nienhuis; O. S. Smith


Publisher
Springer
Year
1994
Tongue
English
Weight
567 KB
Volume
89-89
Category
Article
ISSN
0040-5752

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Knowledge of genetic relationships among genotypes is useful in a plant breeding program because it permits the organization of germplasm and provides for more efficient sampling. The genetic distance (GD) among genotypes can be estimated using random restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs) as molecular markers. Knowledge of the sampling variance associated with RFLP markers is needed to determine how many markers are required for a given level of precision in the estimate of GD. The sampling variance for GD among all pairs of 37 maize (Z. mays L.) inbred lines was estimated from 1202 RFLPs. The 1202 polymorphisms were generated from 251 enzyme-probe combinations (EPC). The sampling variance was used to determine how large a sample of RFLPs was required to provide a given level of precision. The coefficient of variation (CV) associated with GD has a nearly linear relationship between its expected standard deviation and mean. The magnitude of the decrease in the mean CV for GD with increasing numbers of bands was dependent upon the sampling unit; e.g., individual polymorphic bands vs EPC, and the degree of relatedness among the inbreds compared. The rate of reduction in mean CV with increasing sample size was the same regardless of the restriction enzyme used, BamHI, EcoRI or HindIII, when the bootstrap sampling units were individual polymorphic bands. In constrast, although the rate of reduction (slopes) was the same, the intercepts of the mean CVs were different when EPCs were used as the bootstrap sampling unit. This difference was due to the higher number of bands per EPC in BamHI (4.94) compared with EcoRI (4.83) and HindIII (4.63).


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Estimation of the Mean in a Variance Com
โœ Dr. R. Trommer ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1985 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 475 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

We consider two simple estimators of the mean p in a variance component model (one-way classification, unbalanced case) 1 1 FI=; 7 Yjk; F2=; 2 g j \* ## I I n dependence of the estimation procedure (ANOVA, MINQ, sampling theory) we obtain several different estimators for t h e variances of pl and

Comparison of Resubstitution, Data Split
โœ Dr. U. Abel; J. Berger ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1986 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 432 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

E s t i m a t q the diagnoetic efficienoy of marker t e & on the baain of the training eet is an intricate problem of discriminant analysis for which no analytical whtion exita. The paper outlines the problem. describee various popular entimation produrea and presenta the reeulta of computer nimulst