The standard liver volume (LV) of a recipient is estimated in liver transplantation to determine the minimum LV necessary for the recipient. Simple linear formulas of LV estimation were developed for the Japanese and Caucasian populations. The present study examined the applicability of the reported
Estimation of liver size for liver transplantation: The impact of age and gender
✍ Scribed by Alexander Choukèr; André Martignoni; Martin Dugas; Wolfgang Eisenmenger; Rolf Schauer; Ines Kaufmann; Gutav Schelling; Florian Löhe; Karl-Walter Jauch; Klaus Peter; Manfred Thiel
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2004
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 96 KB
- Volume
- 10
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1527-6465
- DOI
- 10.1002/lt.20113
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
In general, the liver is considered to be larger in males than in females. In the present study, data on liver weight from 728 legal autopsies were analyzed with respect to gender, age, body height (BH), body weight (BW), body mass index (BMI), and body surface area (BSA). Descriptive statistics revealed that liver weight increases with age, reaching maximum values between 41 and 50 years in men and between 51 and 60 years in women. Thereafter, liver weight decreases again. Because this loss in liver weight starts earlier in men while liver weight continues to rise in women, the difference in liver weight between men and women is lost above the age of 50. Thus, this age defines a threshold value below which gender is expected to be a critical factor in the calculation of liver weight. When demographic data mentioned above were subjected to multiple stepwise linear regression analysis, liver weight (LW) was best predicted in younger people (16 -50 years) by body weight, age, and gender: LW (g) ؍ 452 ؉ 16.34 ؋ BW ؉ 11.85 ؋ age ؊ 166 ؋ gender (r 2 ؍ 0.381; "gender": 1 ؍ female, 0 ؍ male). In contrast, in elderly people (51 -70 years) LW was best predicted by BW and age only. Gender was not a significant factor. LW (g) ؍ 1390 ؉ 15.94 ؋ BW ؊ 12.86 ؋ age (r 2 ؍ 0.35). When these formulas were applied to demographic data from 97 organ donors and compared to published formulas (which, however, do not consider the age-dependent effects of gender), the new formulas best predicted male to female liver weight ratios in younger and elderly donors. In conclusion, the new formulas might better predict liver weight in organ donors and transplant recipients to avoid liver size mismatch. (Liver Transpl 2004;10:678-685.) S uccessful liver transplantation is the result of a large spectrum of factors, including optimal match of donors and recipients with respect to acute physical state, 1
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
The aim of this study was to assess the impact of donor gender on small-for-size (SFS) liver transplantation in male recipients using a rat model. Adult female or male Lewis rats were used as donors and male Lewis rats as recipients. Size-matched (SM) and SFS liver grafts from either male or female
DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES LIVER TRANSPLANTATION DATABASE symptoms, signs, biochemical laboratory test results, serology, radio-transplantation. (HEPATOLOGY 1996;24:89-96.) logical, and histological results as well as information on the transplantation procedure itself. Detailed information on t
Longevity in the developed world continues to increase. In the United States from 1950 to 2005, those 65 to 75 yr of age increased twice as much as the overall annual growth rate of the population while those Ͼ75 yr increased 2.9 times as much. 1 Projections indicate that the rate of growth by 2050
Objective: To identify predictors of graft and recipient survival from a single-institution series of in situ splitliver transplantations and compare outcomes to living donor and whole organs for adults and children. Summary Background Data: Split-liver transplantation is a surgical technique that c
weight; GWBW, graft weight as a percentage of total body weight; ELV, expected liver volume.