𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Estimating the causal effect of compliance on binary outcome in randomized controlled trials

✍ Scribed by Els Goetghebeur; Geert Molenberghs; Joanne Katz


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1998
Tongue
English
Weight
871 KB
Volume
17
Category
Article
ISSN
0277-6715

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


We examine likelihood based methods aimed at analysing the causal effect of actual exposure to drug treatment on a (repeated) binary outcome in two randomized trials with partial compliance. Starting with the univariate compliance summary 'total treatment dose history', we apply a method for ordinal compliance and monotone dose response, proposed by Goetghebeur and Molenberghs. In a short duration trial of blood pressure reduction, this summary leads to meaningful effect estimators. However, in the analysis of a vitamin A trial, this method reaches a boundary solution; the estimated possible benefit from vitamin A for children who did not receive any pills on the treatment arm is zero. In our formulation the number of pills that were taken captures part of the outcome, and the corresponding effect parameters suffer from this confounding. To gain additional insight, we account explicitly for the temporal structure of compliance. We extend the likelihood based methodology for univariate ordered compliance to more dimensional compliance with only a partial order structure on exposure. The randomization assumptions in the causal formulation of Rubin are translated to this setting. We motivate a set of parametric assumptions on the joint distribution of potential outcomes and observed compliance levels and reanalyse the vitamin A trial. Our findings suggest that one capsule of vitamin A had a large impact on mortality during the first 4 months. The greatest reduction in risk was estimated amongst children who received two doses. This supports findings from a vitamin A trial in Ghana and in Nepal. Finally, we discuss extensions of this method, covering uncensored and censored grouped survival data.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Estimating treatment effects in randomiz
✍ Nico Nagelkerke; Vaclav Fidler; Roos Bernsen; Martien Borgdorff πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2000 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 125 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

In clinical trials where patients are randomized between two treatment arms, not all patients comply with the treatment they were randomly assigned to. The reasons for (non)compliance may be associated with the outcome variable and thereby act as confounders. The standard way of analysing such trial

Estimating treatment effects in randomiz
✍ Barton H. Hamilton πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2001 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 150 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract This paper assesses the causal impact of late‐term (8th month) maternal smoking on birthweight using data from a randomized clinical trial, in which some women were encouraged not to smoke, while others were not. The estimation of treatment effects in this case is made difficult as a re

The problem of measurement error in mode
✍ Graham Dunn πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1999 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 154 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

This paper explores the implications of measurement error in the analysis of compliance}response relationships in data from randomized trials. Given that compliance measures are rarely, if ever, error-free indicators of exposure it is argued that both the designs for the collection of compliance dat

Randomized controlled trial testing the
✍ Kittichai Promrat; David E. Kleiner; Heather M. Niemeier; Elizabeth Jackvony; Ma πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2009 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 304 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a chronic progressive liver disease that is strongly associated with obesity. Currently, there is no approved therapy for NASH. Weight reduction is typically recommended, but efficacy data are lacking. We performed a randomized controlled trial to examine the e

The implications of variation in outcome
✍ Chris Roberts πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1999 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 100 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

Methodological work on randomized trials has largely concerned pharmacological interventions in which the e!ects of the attending health professional may be regarded as minor. In other clinical settings, such as surgery, talk or physical therapies, sta! speci"c variation may make generalization prob