✦ LIBER ✦

Estimating Ordered Binomial Proportions with the Use of Group Testing

✍ Scribed by Joshua M. Tebbs and William H. Swallow

Book ID: 124305946
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Year: 2003
Tongue: English
Weight: 984 KB
Volume: 90
Category: Article
ISSN: 0006-3444
DOI: 10.2307/30042055

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Improved Estimation of Proportions Using

Improved Estimation of Proportions Using Inverse Binomial Group Testing

✍ Graham Hepworth 📂 Article 📅 2013 🏛 Springer-Verlag 🌐 English ⚖ 342 KB

Binomial Group-Testing with an Unknown P

Binomial Group-Testing with an Unknown Proportion of Defectives

✍ Milton Sobel and Phyllis A. Groll 📂 Article 📅 1966 🏛 American Statistical Association 🌐 English ⚖ 857 KB

Estimation of the binomial parameter in

Estimation of the binomial parameter in group testing

✍ A. L. Gusev 📂 Article 📅 1987 🏛 Springer US 🌐 English ⚖ 250 KB

Robustness of Group Testing in the Estim

Robustness of Group Testing in the Estimation of Proportions

✍ M. Hung; William H. Swallow 📂 Article 📅 1999 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 677 KB

Confidence intervals for proportions est

Confidence intervals for proportions estimated by group testing with groups of unequal size

✍ Graham Hepworth 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 Springer-Verlag 🌐 English ⚖ 308 KB

On the maximum total sample size of a gr

On the maximum total sample size of a group sequential test about binomial proportions

✍ James L. Kepner; Myron N. Chang 📂 Article 📅 2003 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 105 KB

It is well known that the standard single-stage binomial test is uniformly most powerful to detect an increase or decrease in a binomial proportion. The general perception is that, to achieve a ÿxed signiÿcance level and power, a group sequential test will require a larger maximum total sample size