In the context of set membership identification the feasible parameter set is defined as the set of plant parameters which are consistent with the model structure, the assumptions on (unknown but bounded) disturbances and all available measurements. It appears more convenient in practice to build an
Estimating correlations from epidemiological data in the presence of measurement error
โ Scribed by Keith B. G. Dear; Martin L. Puterman; Annette J. Dobson
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1997
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 132 KB
- Volume
- 16
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0277-6715
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
Analysis of a major multi-site epidemiologic study of heart disease has required estimation of the pairwise correlation of several measurements across subpopulations. Because the measurements from each subpopulation were subject to sampling variability, the Pearson product moment estimator of these correlations produces biased estimates. This paper proposes a model that takes into account within and between sub-population variation, provides algorithms for obtaining maximum likelihood estimates of these correlations and discusses several approaches for obtaining interval estimates.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
It is becoming standard practice in epidemiology to adjust relative risk estimates to remove the bias caused by non-di!erential errors in the exposure measurement. Estimation of the correction factor is often based on a validation study incorporating repeated measures of exposure, which are assumed
The bias in relative risk estimates caused by errors in measurement of the relevant exposure is being increasingly recognized in epidemiology. Estimation of the necessary correction factor to remove this bias for univariate exposure has been considered in an earlier paper. We consider here the multi
We explore the effects of measurement error in a time-varying covariate for a mixed model applied to a longitudinal study of plasma levels and dietary intake of beta-carotene. We derive a simple expression for the bias of large sample estimates of the variance of random effects in a longitudinal mod
In evaluating prognostic factors by means of regression models, missing values in the covariate data are a frequent complication. There exist statistical tools to analyse such incomplete data in an efficient manner, and in this paper we make use of the traditional maximum likelihood principle. As we