𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Establishing treatment benchmarks for mammography-screened breast cancer population based on a review of evidence-based clinical guidelines

✍ Scribed by Geoff Delaney; Jesmin Shafiq; Genevieve Chappell; Michael Barton


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2008
Tongue
English
Weight
287 KB
Volume
112
Category
Article
ISSN
0008-543X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

BACKGROUND.

No benchmarks exist in the screened breast cancer population to establish the optimal proportions of newly detected cancer patients who should receive the ideal treatment. The aim of the study was to estimate the optimal proportion of cases diagnosed in a breast‐screening program who should receive treatment according to evidence‐based cancer treatment guidelines and to compare these optimal rates with actual treatment rates.

METHODS.

Optimal surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and hormone therapy utilization trees were constructed based on indications from evidence‐based treatment guidelines. The proportions with clinical attributes that indicated a possible benefit from a particular treatment were obtained from epidemiologic data from BreastScreen Victoria. The optimal proportions of screen‐detected breast cancer patients who should receive various therapies were then calculated using TreeAge software and compared with the actual proportions obtained from the epidemiologic data.

RESULTS.

According to the best available evidence, the proportion of screen‐detected breast cancer patients who have attributes suitable for various treatments are: breast‐conserving surgery (BCS) 85%, mastectomy 15%, radiotherapy 87%, chemotherapy 34%, and hormonal therapy 68%. The actual BCS utilization rate in Victoria was similar to the optimal rate (79% vs 85%), whereas there appeared to be underuse of radiotherapy (62% vs 87%), chemotherapy (19% vs 34%), and hormonal therapy (49% vs 68%) when compared with guideline recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS.

This research provided optimal treatment utilization rates for screen‐detected breast cancer and a comparison of best practice evidence and actual treatment. The results showed comparable rates for surgery but suggested underutilization of radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and hormone therapy. Cancer 2008. © 2008 American Cancer Society.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


The role of radiotherapy in cancer treat
✍ Geoff Delaney; Susannah Jacob; Carolyn Featherstone; Michael Barton 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 100 KB

## Abstract Radiotherapy utilization rates for cancer vary widely internationally. It has previously been suggested that approximately 50% of all cancer patients should receive radiation. However, this estimate was not evidence‐based. The aim of this study was to estimate the ideal proportion of ne