✦ LIBER ✦

Errors in the gran addition method: Part I. Theoretical calculation of statistical errors

✍ Scribed by J. Buffle; N. Parthasarathy; D. Monnier

Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 1972
Tongue: English
Weight: 641 KB
Volume: 59
Category: Article
ISSN: 0003-2670
DOI: 10.1016/0003-2670(72)80011-4

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Errors in the gran addition method: Part

Errors in the gran addition method: Part II. Theoretical calculation of systematic errors

✍ J. Buffle 📂 Article 📅 1972 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 423 KB

The importance of statistical errors on the different parameters involved in the Gran addition technique has been discussed in Part I of this series'. In order to obtain optimal predtsion in volume V, obt;dmc~ b,v e~W4xsasjo4 fm paramekrs V miw V,, C, C,, N (for definitions, see Part I) should be ch

Errors in the gran addition method: Expe

Errors in the gran addition method: Experimental determination of errors by means of a fluoride-selective electrode

✍ N. Parthasarathy; J. Buffle; D. Monnier 📂 Article 📅 1972 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 425 KB

The importance of the possible errors in the Gran plot method which are reported here, has not been studied before, although several authors have used this method l-3. In Part I of this series4 the errors introduced by various parameters in the addition technique were discussed and a theoretical eva

On the Importance of Random Error in the

On the Importance of Random Error in the Study of Probability Judgment. Part I: New Theoretical Developments

✍ DAVID V. BUDESCU; IDO EREV; THOMAS S. WALLSTEN 📂 Article 📅 1997 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 221 KB 👁 2 views

Erev, Wallsten, and Budescu (1994) demonstrated that over-and undercon®dence can be observed simultaneously in judgment studies, as a function of the method used to analyze the data. They proposed a general model to account for this apparent paradox, which assumes that overt responses represent t

Calculating the electrostatic potential

Calculating the electrostatic potential of molecules in solution: Method and error assessment

✍ Michael K. Gilson; Kim A. Sharp; Barry H. Honig 📂 Article 📅 1988 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 795 KB

We present a numerical method for calculating the electrostatic potential of molecules in solution, using the linearized Poisson-Boltzmann equation. The emphasis in this work is on applications to biological macromolecules. The accuracy of the method is assessed by comparisons with analytic solution

An additional stiffness parameter measur

An additional stiffness parameter measure of error of the second kind in the finite element method

✍ Gangan Prathap 📂 Article 📅 1985 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 679 KB

Re-calculating the sample size in intern

Re-calculating the sample size in internal pilot study designs with control of the type I error rate

✍ Meinhard Kieser; Tim Friede 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 161 KB 👁 2 views

When designing a clinical trial, there is usually some uncertainty about the variability of the primary outcome variable. This may lead to an unnecessarily high or inadequately low sample size. The internal pilot study approach uses data from patients recruited up to an interim stage to re-estimate