✦ LIBER ✦

Erratum to Quasi-parabolic Siegel formula

✍ Scribed by Nitsure, Nitin

Book ID: 112906296
Publisher: Indian Academy of Sciences
Year: 1997
Tongue: English
Weight: 78 KB
Volume: 107
Category: Article
ISSN: 0253-4142
DOI: 10.1007/bf02837731

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Quasi-parabolic Siegel formula

✍ Nitsure, Nitin 📂 Article 📅 1996 🏛 Springer-Verlag 🌐 English ⚖ 269 KB

Parabolic quasi-concavity for solutions

Parabolic quasi-concavity for solutions to parabolic problems in convex rings

✍ Kazuhiro Ishige; Paolo Salani 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 281 KB

## Abstract We investigate some geometric properties of level sets of the solutions of parabolic problems in convex rings. We introduce the notion of __parabolic quasi‐concavity__, which involves time and space jointly and is a stronger property than the spatial quasi‐concavity, and study the conve

A regularized Siegel–Weil formula on and

A regularized Siegel–Weil formula on and application to theta lifting from to

✍ Xiong, Wei 📂 Article 📅 2013 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 292 KB

Erratum to: A higher rank Lefschetz form

Erratum to: A higher rank Lefschetz formula

✍ Anton Deitmar 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 Springer-Verlag 🌐 English ⚖ 207 KB

Fourier expansion of holomorphic Siegel

Fourier expansion of holomorphic Siegel modular forms with respect to the minimal parabolic subgroup

✍ Hiroaki Narita 📂 Article 📅 1999 🏛 Springer-Verlag 🌐 French ⚖ 250 KB

Erratum to the paper “On quasi-Riemannia

Erratum to the paper “On quasi-Riemannian foliations”

✍ Pawel G. Walczak 📂 Article 📅 1991 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 36 KB

The argument used in my paper does not work. Namely, the dimension of the space of horizontal vectors tangent to the bundle E considered in the paper is in general less than the dimension of the manifold M. So, the proof of Theorems 1 and 2 in Section 4 is not correct. However, using the estimates