๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Equivalent delivery procedures for gnma futures contracts and options

โœ Scribed by Walter L. Eckardt Jr.


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1984
Tongue
English
Weight
578 KB
Volume
4
Category
Article
ISSN
0270-7314

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


utures contracts in Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA) F passthrough certificates were introduced on the Chicago Board of Trade (CBT) in 1975. Two types of contracts exist. The GNMA Collateralized Depository Receipt (CDR) future delivery vehicle is a CDR backed by GNMA certificates. The Certificate Delivery GNMA future delivery vehicle is a specific "batch" of GNMA certificates. The Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE) had planned to initiate trading in put and call options on GNMA certificates in the fall of 1982, but the establishment of these instruments has been postponed.

GNMA passthroughs exist in a wide variety of coupon and maturity specifications. It would be manifestly impractical to establish futures and options for each GNMA issue (or "pool"). Instead, a system of "equivalent delivery" has been established for futures and proposed for options. There are rules that stipulate acceptable quantities of GNMA certificates and associated terms necessary to satisfy futures and options obligations. The rules specify a "contract grade" which delineates the set of acceptable securities and then sets forth delivery equivalence within grade as a function of coupon. The specific coupon associated with a GNMA futures contract or option is called the par grade security. For all contracts, the current par grade coupon is %%.

There is no assurance that the equivalent delivery rules are neutral in an economic sense. Indeed, there will often be a "best coupon to deliver" in the sense that the controlling party (the futures short, the call short, or the put long) is able to achieve the maximum return within the set of contract grade securities. In this article the futures and (proposed) option delivery procedures are briefly characterized. Next the influence of the relationship between coupon and yield to maturity upon the determination of the best coupon to deliver for each instrument are investigated. Numerical illustrations are provided to indicate the dollar cost of nonoptimal delivery. Finally, the implications of these findings as they relate to trading and valuation are discussed.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Put-call-futures parity and arbitrage op
โœ Richard A. Followill; Billy P. Helms ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1990 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 912 KB

long the reigning market for gold futures contracts, T introduced gold futures options in October of 1982. Immediate, sustained interest in the new contracts created a liquid market for options on COMEX gold futures contracts.' Trading in gold futures options occurs in close proximity to trading in

Empirical tests of boundary conditions f
โœ Edward C. Blomeyer; James C. Boyd ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1988 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 725 KB

his study provides an ex ante and expost test of market efficiency for the T options on Treasury bond futures contracts traded on the Chicago Board of Trade. All option and future contract price changes are examined from market inception, in October 1982, through the middle of June 1983 for violatio