✦ LIBER ✦

Epistemic values in the Burgess Shale debate

✍ Scribed by Christian Baron

Book ID: 116883189
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 2009
Tongue: English
Weight: 208 KB
Volume: 40
Category: Article
ISSN: 1369-8486
DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2009.09.008

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Arguments, Tests, and the Burgess Shale-

Arguments, Tests, and the Burgess Shale-A Commentary on the Debate

✍ Daniel W. McShea 📂 Article 📅 1993 🏛 Bioone 🌐 English ⚖ 507 KB

Misadventures in the Burgess Shale

✍ Collins, Desmond 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 Nature Publishing Group 🌐 English ⚖ 928 KB

Fossil preservation in the Burgess Shale

✍ KENNETH M. TO WE 📂 Article 📅 1996 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 238 KB

The Distinction Between Epistemic and No

The Distinction Between Epistemic and Non-Epistemic Values in the Natural Sciences

✍ Maria Pournari 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 Springer Netherlands 🌐 English ⚖ 137 KB

Demecology in the Cambrian: synchronized

Demecology in the Cambrian: synchronized molting in arthropods from the Burgess Shale

✍ Joachim T Haug, Jean-Bernard Caron, Carolin Haug 📂 Article 📅 2013 🏛 BioMed Central 🌐 English ⚖ 823 KB

Hooking some stem-group “worms”: fossil

Hooking some stem-group “worms”: fossil lophotrochozoans in the Burgess Shale

✍ Nicholas J. Butterfield 📂 Article 📅 2006 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 197 KB

## Abstract The fossil record plays a key role in reconstructing deep evolutionary relationships through its documentation of the early diverging stem groups leading to extant phyla. In the middle Cambrian Burgess Shale, two famously problematic worms, __Odontogriphus__ and __Wiwaxia__, have recent