๐”– Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

๐Ÿ“

Epistemic Justification

โœ Scribed by Richard Swinburne


Publisher
Oxford University Press, USA
Year
2001
Tongue
English
Leaves
271
Category
Library

โฌ‡  Acquire This Volume

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Richard Swinburne offers an original treatment of a question at the heart of epistemology: what makes a belief rational, or justified in holding? He maps the rival accounts of philosophers on epistemic justification (''internalist'' and ''externalist''), arguing that they are really accounts of different concepts. He distinguishes between synchronic justification (justification at a time) and diachronic justification (synchronic justification resulting from adequate investigation)--both internalist and externalist. He also argues that most kinds of justification are worth having because they are indicative of truth; however, it is only justification of internalist kinds that can guide a believer's actions. Swinburne goes on to show the usefulness of the probability calculus in elucidating how empirical evidence makes beliefs probably true.

โœฆ Table of Contents


Contents......Page 8
Introduction......Page 10
1. Theories of Synchronic Justification......Page 18
2. Belief......Page 41
3. Probability......Page 65
4. The Criteria of Logical Probability......Page 83
5. Basicality......Page 138
6. The Value of Synchronic Justification......Page 161
7. The Value of Diachronic Justification......Page 174
8. Knowledge......Page 201
Appendix. Predictivism......Page 230
Additional Notes......Page 242
D......Page 268
K......Page 269
R......Page 270
Z......Page 271


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Epistemic Justification
โœ Richard Swinburne ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2001 ๐ŸŒ English

Richard Swinburne offers an original treatment of a question at the heart of epistemology: what makes a belief rational, or justified in holding? He maps the rival accounts of philosophers on epistemic justification ("internalist" and "externalist"), arguing that they are really accounts of differen

Evidentialism and Epistemic Justificatio
โœ Kevin McCain ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2014 ๐Ÿ› Routledge ๐ŸŒ English

Evidentialism is a popular theory of epistemic justification, yet, as early proponents of the theory Earl Conee and Richard Feldman admit, there are many elements that must be developed before Evidentialism can provide a full account of epistemic justification, or well-founded belief. It is the aim

A Theory of Epistemic Justification
โœ Dr. Jarrett Leplin (auth.) ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2009 ๐Ÿ› Springer Netherlands ๐ŸŒ English

<p><P>This book proposes an original theory of epistemic justification that offers a new way to relate justification to the epistemic goal of truth-conducive belief. The theory is based on a novel analysis of reliable belief-formation that answers classic objections to reliability theories in episte

A Theory of Epistemic Justification
โœ Dr. Jarrett Leplin (auth.) ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2009 ๐Ÿ› Springer Netherlands ๐ŸŒ English

<p><P>This book proposes an original theory of epistemic justification that offers a new way to relate justification to the epistemic goal of truth-conducive belief. The theory is based on a novel analysis of reliable belief-formation that answers classic objections to reliability theories in episte

A Theory of Epistemic Justification
โœ Dr. Jarrett Leplin (auth.) ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2009 ๐Ÿ› Springer Netherlands ๐ŸŒ English

<p><P>This book proposes an original theory of epistemic justification that offers a new way to relate justification to the epistemic goal of truth-conducive belief. The theory is based on a novel analysis of reliable belief-formation that answers classic objections to reliability theories in episte