✦ LIBER ✦

Epigenetics in Prostate Cancer: Biologic and Clinical Relevance

✍ Scribed by Carmen Jerónimo; Patrick J. Bastian; Anders Bjartell; Giuseppina M. Carbone; James W.F. Catto; Susan J. Clark; Rui Henrique; William G. Nelson; Shahrokh F. Shariat

Book ID: 113612396
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 2011
Tongue: English
Weight: 536 KB
Volume: 60
Category: Article
ISSN: 0302-2838
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.06.035

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Clinical relevance of biologic factors i

Clinical relevance of biologic factors in male breast cancer

✍ Marion E. Meijer-van Gelder; Maxime P. Look; Joan Bolt-de Vries; Harry A. Peters 📂 Article 📅 2001 🏛 Springer US 🌐 English ⚖ 111 KB

Vitamin D and Prostate Cancer: Biologic

Vitamin D and Prostate Cancer: Biologic Interactions and Clinical Potentials

✍ Gary J. Miller 📂 Article 📅 1998 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 46 KB

Identification, characterization, and bi

Identification, characterization, and biological relevance of prostate cancer stem cells from clinical specimens

✍ Susan Kasper 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 133 KB

Biological and clinical relevance of Lam

Biological and clinical relevance of Laminin-5 in cancer

✍ Gianluigi Giannelli; Salvatore Antonaci 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 124 KB

Clinical Relevance of Biologic Findings

Clinical Relevance of Biologic Findings in PTSD

✍ Rachel Yehuda 📂 Article 📅 2002 🏛 Springer US 🌐 English ⚖ 67 KB

Epidemiologic determinants of clinically

Epidemiologic determinants of clinically relevant prostate cancer

✍ Margaret R. Spitz; Sara S. Strom; Yuko Yamamura; Patricia Troncoso; Richard J. B 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 French ⚖ 67 KB 👁 2 views

While tumor volume and Gleason scores are the best available prognostic indicators for prostate cancer, contemporary predictive methods are unable to identify which men with Gleason scores of 7 have clinically insignificant tumors that will not progress and which men will develop highly aggressive p