𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Enhanced chemotherapy delivery by intraarterial infusion and blood-brain barrier disruption in malignant brain tumors : The Sherbrooke experience

✍ Scribed by David Fortin; Annick Desjardins; Andrew Benko; Theophylle Niyonsega; Marie Boudrias


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2005
Tongue
English
Weight
385 KB
Volume
103
Category
Article
ISSN
0008-543X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

BACKGROUND

The treatment of malignant brain tumors is hampered by the presence of the blood‐brain barrier, which limits chemotherapy penetration to the central nervous system (CNS). In recent years, different strategies have been designed to circumvent this physiologic barrier. The osmotic blood‐brain barrier disruption (BBBD) procedure is one such strategy, and has been studied extensively in preclinical and clinical studies. The authors detail their experience so far with the procedure in the context of an open Phase II study in the treatment of malignant brain tumors.

METHODS

Patients with histologically proven malignant gliomas, primitive neuroectodermal tumors, primary CNS lymphomas, and metastatic disease to the brain were eligible. Patients enrolled were treated every 4 weeks (1 cycle) for ≤ 12 cycles. A methotrexate‐based regimen was offered to patients with lymphomas, whereas a carboplatin‐based regimen was offered to patients with all other histologies. Before intraarterial chemotherapy infusion, patients were submitted to an osmotic BBBD procedure.

RESULTS

Seventy‐two patients were included in the current report. The overall median survival times (MST) from treatment initiation for glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), anaplastic oligodendrogliomas, primary CNS lymphomas, and metastases were, respectively, 9.1, 13.9, not reached, and 9.9 months, whereas time to disease progression was 4.1, 9.2, 12.3, and 3.3 months. The MST from diagnosis was 32.2 months for GBM.

CONCLUSIONS

These encouraging results prompted the authors to further refine their knowledge of the potential contribution of this procedure in the treatment of brain tumors. These authors designed a randomized Phase III study for patients with GBM that is now open. Cancer 2005. © 2005 American Cancer Society.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Enhanced chemotherapy delivery by intraa
✍ David Fortin; Cathy Gendron; Marie Boudrias; Marie-Pierre Garant 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 349 KB

## Abstract ## BACKGROUND. Cerebral metastases are clinically significant in 10% to 30% of patients with neoplasia. Multiple cerebral metastases are typically treated with palliative radiotherapy. There is no consensus on the role of enhanced chemotherapy delivery as an adjuvant treatment modality

Intraarterial chemotherapy and osmotic b
✍ Kristoph Jahnke; Dale F. Kraemer; Kristin R. Knight; David Fortin; Susan Bell; N 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 208 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract ## BACKGROUND. The rate of durable responses in embryonal and certain germ cell tumors of the central nervous system (CNS) is unsatisfactory. Intraarterial chemotherapy and osmotic blood‐brain barrier disruption (IA/BBBD) increases drug delivery to the CNS. ## METHODS. Data of patien

Safety and efficacy of a multicenter stu
✍ Nancy D. Doolittle; Michael E. Miner; Walter A. Hall; Tali Siegal; E. Jerome Han 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 309 KB 👁 2 views

The aim of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of intraarterial chemotherapy with osmotic opening of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) for the treatment of malignant brain tumors when administered across multiple centers.