Engagement as process in human-computer interactions
✍ Scribed by Heather L. O'Brien; Elaine G. Toms
- Publisher
- Wiley (John Wiley & Sons)
- Year
- 2006
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 143 KB
- Volume
- 42
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0044-7870
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Recently there has been an increased emphasis on holistic user experiences in human‐computer interactions. Interface design is moving beyond usability, aiming to be aesthetically pleasing, emotionally appealing, and engaging. The term engagement is frequently mentioned in the literature as a goal of interface design, yet the construct remains abstract and ill‐defined. The well‐established frameworks of Flow Theory, Play Theory, and Aesthetic Theory provide a foundation in which to ground engagement and to begin to explore the attributes that must be present in engaging design. We conceptualize engagement as a process rather than a single instance. Our proposed model views engaging interactions as being comprised of three distinct stages: the user must become engaged, sustain the engagement, and eventually disengage from the system. Establishing a solid framework for engagement will enable us to operationally define the term and to develop techniques and instruments for measuring it. Without a rich, theoretical understanding of what constitutes engaging interactions between users and computer interfaces, we cannot ensure that design practices are truly engaging; user's experience with computer‐mediated environments must involve the user cognitively, behaviorally, and affectively.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
Human-computer interaction (HCI) is the area of intersection between psychology and the social sciences, on the one hand, and computer science and technology, on the other. HCI researchers analyse and design-specific user-interface technologies (e.g. three-dimensional pointing devices, interactive v
This study investigated how people make attributions of responsibility when interacting with computers. In particular, two questions were addressed: under what circumstances will users blame computers for failed outcomes? And under what circumstances will users credit computers for successful outcom
The last decade has shown a strong in#uence of cognitive psychology and cognitive science perspectives on human-computer interaction (HCI) theory, design and practice. As complex systems have come to dominate many real world domains, it has become necessary to use cognitive task analysis, cognitive