𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Energy risk management and value at risk modeling

✍ Scribed by Mehdi Sadeghi; Saeed Shavvalpour


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
2006
Tongue
English
Weight
197 KB
Volume
34
Category
Article
ISSN
0301-4215

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


The value of energy trades can change over time with market conditions and underlying price variables. The rise of competition and deregulation in energy markets has led to relatively free energy markets that are characterized by high price shifts. Within oil markets the volatile oil price environment after OPEC agreements in the 1970s requires a risk quantification.'' Value-at-risk'' has become an essential tool for this end when quantifying market risk. There are various methods for calculating value-at-risk. The methods we introduced in this paper are Historical Simulation ARMA Forecasting and Variance-Covariance based on GARCH modeling approaches. The results show that among various approaches the HSAF methodology presents more efficient results, so that if the level of confidence is 99%, the value-at-risk calculated through HSAF methodology is greater than actual price changes in almost 97.6 percent of the forecasting period.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Selection of Value-at-Risk models
✍ Mandira Sarma; Susan Thomas; Ajay Shah πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2003 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 128 KB

## Abstract Value‐at‐Risk (VaR) is widely used as a tool for measuring the market risk of asset portfolios. However, alternative VaR implementations are known to yield fairly different VaR forecasts. Hence, every use of VaR requires choosing among alternative forecasting models. This paper undertak

Risk factor beta conditional value-at-ri
✍ Andrei Semenov πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2009 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 101 KB

## Abstract We propose a new approach to the estimation of the portfolio Value‐at‐Risk. Based on the assumption that the same macroeconomic factors affect returns of all assets in a portfolio, this methodology allows the generation of the sequence of hypothetical future equilibrium portfolio return

Hedging and value at risk
✍ Richard D. F. Harris; Jian Shen πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2006 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 138 KB

## Abstract In this article, it is shown that although minimum‐variance hedging unambiguously reduces the standard deviation of portfolio returns, it can increase both left skewness and kurtosis; consequently the effectiveness of hedging in terms of value at risk (VaR) and conditional value at risk

Value-at-Risk for country risk ratings
✍ Michael McAleer; Bernardo da Veiga; Suhejla Hoti πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2011 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 403 KB