𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Endothelial progenitor cells do not contribute to tumor endothelium in primary and metastatic tumors

✍ Scribed by Anke Wickersheim; Mark Kerber; Lourdes Sanchez de Miguel; Karl H. Plate; Marcia Regina Machein


Book ID
102862895
Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2009
Tongue
French
Weight
530 KB
Volume
125
Category
Article
ISSN
0020-7136

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Despite extensive research, the contribution of bone‐marrow‐derived endothelial progenitor cells (BM‐EPC) to tumor angiogenesis remains controversial. In previous publications, the extent of incorporation of BM‐EPCs into the endothelial cell (EC) layer in different tumor models has been reported as significant in some studies but undetectable in others. Here, we studied the differentiation of BM‐EPCs and its contribution to tumor vessels in experimental and spontaneous lung metastasis (B16 melanoma and prostate carcinoma), in an autochthonous transgenic model of prostate tumorigenesis, in orthotopically implanted lung tumors [Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC)], in heterotopic subcutaneous models (LLC and C1 prostate carcinoma) growing in green fluorescent protein (GFP)‐expressing bone marrow (BM) chimeras. Immunofluorescence was performed with a set of endothelial and hematopoietic markers and confocal microscopy was used to generate 3D reconstruction images. By performing rigorously conducted morphological studies, we found no evidence of BM‐EPCs differentiation into tumor endothelium independently of tumor type, grade and organ site in primary and metastatic tumors. The vast majority of GFP^+^ cells were trafficking leucocytes or periendothelial myeloid cells. To explore the possibility that local overexpression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) might increase the numbers of incorporated BM‐EPCs, we analyzed tumors genetically manipulated to overexpress VEGF~164~. Local VEGF production induces a massive infiltration of bone‐marrow‐derived cells, but did not lead to vessel wall integration of these cells. Collectively, these findings suggest that during tumor progression vascularization occurs primarily via classical tumor angiogenesis (e.g., sprouting of pre‐existing ECs), whereas BM‐EPCs do not incorporate into the vessel wall to any significant extent. © 2009 UICC


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


The Ape-1/Ref-1 redox antagonist E3330 i
✍ Gang-Ming Zou; Collins Karikari; Yasuaki Kabe; Hiroshi Handa; Robert A. Anders; 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 314 KB

## Abstract The apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1/redox factor‐1 (Ape‐1/Ref‐1) is a multi‐functional protein, involved in DNA repair and the activation of redox‐sensitive transcription factors. The Ape‐1/Ref‐1 redox domain acts as a cytoprotective element in normal endothelial cells, mitigating

CD133 and CD44 Cell surface markers do n
✍ Alba Rocco; Eleonora Liguori; Giuseppe Pirozzi; Virginia Tirino; Debora Compare; 📂 Article 📅 2012 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 403 KB

## Abstract Emerging evidence suggests that tumors contain and are driven by a cellular component that displays stem cell properties, the so‐called cancer stem cells (CSCs). CSCs have been identified in several solid human cancers; however, there are no data about CSCs in primary human gastric canc