## BACKGROUND. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (EUS-FNA) allows detailed imaging of both intramural and extramural structures of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract and also allows tissue samples to be obtained from masses and lesions in the GI tract. The objective of the cu
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy: A powerful tool to obtain samples from small lesions
โ Scribed by Jhala, Nirag C. ;Jhala, Darshana ;Eltoum, Isam ;Vickers, Selwyn M. ;Wilcox, C. Mel ;Chhieng, David C. ;Eloubeidi, Mohamad A.
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2004
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 137 KB
- Volume
- 102
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0008-543X
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
Background:
Endoscopic ultrasound (eus) is a powerful imaging modality to identify and determine the extent of a lesion. in addition, eus is superior to a computed tomography scan in detecting lesions < 3 cm. the objective of the current study was to determine whether small lesions (< or = 25 mm) affected the specimen adequacy and the diagnostic accuracy for lesions aspirated under eus guidance.
Methods:
In the current study, 209 consecutive eus-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (eus-fnab) samples < or = 25 mm (100 samples) or > 25 mm (109 samples) as determined by eus were obtained from 151 patients with a mean age of 62 years (range, 39-94 years). a cytopathologist present in the endoscopy suite determined specimen adequacy. yield of adequate samples for diagnosis, number of passes, and operating characteristics of eus-fnab for small (< or = 25 mm) and large lesions (>25 mm) were compared.
Results:
The overall yield of obtaining adequate samples for diagnosis was 96% (201 of 209). there was no difference noted with regard to the yield of obtaining samples (96% vs. 96%) from small or large lesions. a mean of 2.5 passes (range, 1-9 passes) was needed to obtain adequate samples from lesions < or = 25 mm, whereas a mean of 4.5 passes (range, 1-11 passes) was needed to obtain adequate samples from lesions > 25 mm. the sensitivity (96% vs. 96%), specificity (100% vs. 100%), and diagnostic accuracy (98% vs. 97%) for eus-fnab were comparable whether the lesion was < or = 25 mm or > 25 mm.
Conclusions:
Eus-fnab was a highly effective technique to obtain samples from small (< or = 25 mm) and large (> 25 mm) lesions without affecting the sensitivity, specificity, or diagnostic accuracy.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES