𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Endorsement of Machiavellian attitudes and mental health status

✍ Scribed by Karen Bogart; Pascal Scoles


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1971
Tongue
English
Weight
258 KB
Volume
27
Category
Article
ISSN
0021-9762

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


PROBLEM

I n experimental studies on college populations, Christie and Geis (2) have demonstrated that persons who endorse Machiavellian attitudes are less scrupulous in their behavior than others who do not have this attitude pattern. The most salient behavioral difference between Machiavellians and persons who reject Machiavellian attitudes is that Machiavellian individuals successfully manipulate others, while resisting attempts by others to manipulate them.

At the same time that Machiavellians are by definition and, apparently, often in fact, wily, cunning, deceitful, the endorsement of Machiavellian attitudes and the manifestation of Machiavellian behaviors may be, to a certain extent, "healthy" responses. Assuming a varying but typically positive correlation between attitudes and behavior(3), it can be suggested that the nonmanipulative behavior of the schizophrenic person, described as lack of purpose and interpersonal isolation ( 5 ) 1 is accompanied by a rejection of manipulative or Machiavellian values. i f schizophrenic persons are less Machiavellian than members of the normal (nondiagnosed) population, then it further may be suggested that remission of schizophrenic behavior is associated with an increase in manipulation of the social environment on the one hand and an increase in endorsement of Machiavellian attitudes on the other.

This study compares a normal (Le., nondiagnosed) population with a clinical population on endorsement of Machiavellian attitudes as measured by responses to Christie's Mach (Machiavellian) Scales. It was predicted that a normal population would endorse more strongly Machiavellian attitudes than would a clinical population with a diagnosis of schizophrenia, and that ex-hospital patients would endorse more strongly Machiavellian attitudes than would in-hospital patients. I n studies involving nonpsychiatric adult populations, males score consistently higher on the Mach Scales than females, and scores on the forced-choice form of the Scale are reliably higher than scores on the Likert form. A sex effect and a test form effect were therefore also expected.

*This study was conducted while the authors were members of the profeysiond s!,aff of Horizon House, Inc., Philadelphia. The authors would like


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


A bitter bean: Mental health status and
✍ Chelas Loo; Ben Tong; Reiko True πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1989 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 926 KB

This interview sample survey of adult residents of San Francisco's Chinatown was conducted in an effort to understand the phenomenon of underutilization of mental health services by Chinese Americans and the reasons underlying this phenomenon. Findings revealed that the use rate of mental health ser

Stigma and Mental Illness: Investigating
✍ SMITH, ALLISON L. ;CASHWELL, CRAIG S. πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2010 πŸ› American Counseling Association 🌐 English βš– 143 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

The authors explored attitudes toward adults with mental illness. Results suggest that mental health trainees and professionals had less stigmatizing attitudes than did non‐mental‐health trainees and professionals. Professionals receiving supervision had higher mean scores on the Benevolence subscal