𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Endocardial extent by contrast enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging is not an accurate method for assessing myocardium at risk; validation with T2-weighted cardiac magnetic resonance imaging

✍ Scribed by Joey Ubachs; Henrik Engblom; David Erlinge; Stefan Jovinge; Erik Hedström; Marcus Carlsson; Håkan Arheden

Publisher
BioMed Central
Year
2010
Tongue
English
Weight
599 KB
Volume
12
Category
Article
ISSN
1097-6647

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis

Publish with Bio Med Central and every scientist can read your work free of charge "BioMed Central will be the most significant development for disseminating the results of biomedical researc h in our lifetime.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Myocardium area at risk measured with de
Myocardium area at risk measured with delayed enhancement after scar remodelling compared with T2-weighted cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
✍ Jacob T Lønborg; Niels Vejlstrup; Anders B Mathiasen; Thomas Engstrøm 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 BioMed Central 🌐 English ⚖ 475 KB

We sought to evaluate the accuracy of the endocardial surface area (ESA) method when applied after scar remodelling (three months after initial infarction) using T2-weigthed imaging as reference.

Myocardium at risk in ST-elevation myoca
Myocardium at risk in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: comparison of T2-weighted edema imaging with the endocardial surface area assessed by magnetic resonance and validation against angiographic scoring
✍ Georg F Fuernau; Ingo Eitel; Vinzenz Franke; Lysann Hildebrandt; Josefine Meissn 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 BioMed Central 🌐 English ⚖ 142 KB

## Objectives T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the endocardial surface area (ESA) assessed by late gadolinium enhanced (LGE) have been introduced as relatively new methods for myocardium at risk assessment in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).