𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Enantioselective gallopamil protein binding

✍ Scribed by Dr. Annette S. Gross; Claudia Eser; Gerd Mikus; Michel Eichelbaum


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1993
Tongue
English
Weight
497 KB
Volume
5
Category
Article
ISSN
0899-0042

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


The protein binding of the enantiomers of gallopamil has been investigated in solutions of human serum albumin, a,-acid glycoprotein and serum. Over the range of concentrations attained after oral gallopamil administration, the binding of both enantiomers to albumin, a,-acid glycoprotein, and serum proteins was independent of gallopamil concentration. The binding to both human serum albumin (40 gfiter) [range of fraction bound vb) R 0.624 to 0.699; S: 0.502 to 0.6051 and a,-acid glycoprotein (0.5 ghter) (range offb R 0.530 to 0.718; S: 0.502 to 0.620) was stereoselective, favoring the (Rbenantiomer (predialysis gallopamil concentrations 2.5 to 10,000 ng/ml). When the enantiomers (predialysis gallopamil concentration 10 ng/ml) were studied separately in drug-free serum samples from six healthy volunteers the fraction of (S)-gallopamil bound (f6: 0.943 * 0.016) was lower (P < 0.05) than that of (R)-gallopamil (tb: 0.960 2 0.010). The serum protein binding of both (R)-and ( S ) -g d o p d was unaffected by their optical antipodes v b R 0.963 -+ 0.011; s: 0.948 2 0.015) indicating that at therapeutic concentrations a protein binding enantiomerenantiomer interaction does not occur. The protein binding of (R)-and (3-gallopamil ex vivo 2 h after single dose oral administration of 50 mg pseudoracemic gallopamil v b R: 0.960 2 0.010: predialysis [Rl 6.9 to 35.3 ng/ml; S: 0.943 2 0.016: predialysis [S] 9.5 to 30.7 ng/ml) was comparable to that observed in vitro in drug-free serum. Gallopamil metabolites formed during first-pass following oral administration, therefore, do not influence the protein binding of (R)-or (S)-gallopamil.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Protein kinase C binding partners
✍ Susan Jaken; Peter J. Parker 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 216 KB

Members of the protein kinase C family respond to second messengers and are involved in controlling a broad array of cellular functions. The overlapping specificity and promiscuity of these proteins has promoted the view that specific binding proteins constrain individual family members to create th

Theophylline protein binding in humans
✍ K. J. Simons; F. E. R. Simons; C. J. Briggs; L. Lo 📂 Article 📅 1979 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 234 KB