Enalapril versus atenolol in the treatment of hypertensive smokers
✍ Scribed by M. Kotamäki; V. Manninen; K. E. Laustiola
- Publisher
- Springer
- Year
- 1993
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 557 KB
- Volume
- 44
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0031-6970
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
A randomised crossover study has been done to compare the antihypertensive efficacy of enalapril and atenolol in 45 smoking, hypertensive men. Treatment was started with enalapril 20 mg/d or atenolol 50 mg/d and, if necessary, the doses were doubled after 4 weeks to achieve a sitting diastolic blood pressure < or = 95 mm Hg, after which hydrochlorothiazide was added, if necessary. Both drugs lowered blood pressure significantly. However, enalapril was more efficient in lowering both systolic and diastolic blood pressure; the mean difference was significant after both 4 and 8 weeks in the sitting systolic (11.6 mm Hg and 7.9 mm Hg) and diastolic (3.3 mm Hg and 3.0 mm Hg) pressures and in the erect systolic pressures (8.2 mm Hg and 7.2 mm Hg), and after 8 weeks in the supine systolic pressure, too (8.9 mm Hg). The effect on enalapril was especially marked in moderate (< 20 cigarettes/day) smokers. The need for diuretics was also significantly less in the enalapril group. It appears that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors may be superior to beta-adrenoceptor blockers in the treatment of hypertensive smoking patients.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
We have compared the efficacy and pharmacokinetics of bisoprolol, a new cardioselective beta-adrenoceptor antagonist, with atenolol in a randomized double-blind crossover study in 12 patients (mean age 53.5 y) with mild to moderate essential hypertension. After a two week placebo wash-out period wit
To compare the effects of enalapril and captopril on blood pressure, serum creatinine (S-Cr), and potassium (S-K) levels, patients with malignant hypertension treated with either 5-10 mg of enalapril (eight cases) or 75-400 mg of captopril (eight cases) were investigated retrospectively. After 2 wee
The medical records of patients presenting to the Hammersmith Hospital hypertension clinic between 1971 and 1981 were examined to determine presenting clinical data, treatment regimes, and both cardiovascular and non cardiovascular mortality and morbidity. When compared with 1004 patients receiving