๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Empirical support for a basic TAT set

โœ Scribed by Floyd S. Irvin; Kenneth Vander Woude


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1971
Tongue
English
Weight
203 KB
Volume
27
Category
Article
ISSN
0021-9762

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Uncovered sun), using those 107 of a total of 151 suns that could be scored unambiguously. The resulting x2 value was significant far beyond the p 5 .001 level ( x2 = 55.29, df = 1).

Covered suns were not more frequent in the drawings of boys (Boys: Girls by Covered Sun: Uncovered Sun); the x2 value was 1.34 (df = 1, p > .lo).

SUMMARY

Based upon the common clinical assumption that a spontaneous drawing of the sun reflects dependency feelings in the person who draws it, we predicted that suns would be more frequently drawn by younger children and by girls. Both hypotheses were confirmed despite the fact that the presence of realistic detailing usually increases with age.

Covered (partially hidden) suns, suggestive of conflict about dependency were drawn much more frequently by older children but with no sex differences. *This study is based on a Ph.D. dissertation submitted to Louisiana State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Ph.D. degree. In this connection, the author wishes to express his gratitude to Joseph G. Dawson, Chairman of his doctoral committee. Requests for re rints and/or copies of symbols used in this study should be sent to Kenneth S. Solway


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


A basic tat set for adolescent males
โœ Aaron Cooper ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1981 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 223 KB
Support set selection for a bductive and
โœ Bart Selman; Hector J. Levesque ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1996 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 987 KB

Of all the possible ways of computing abductive explanations, the ATMS procedure is one of the most popular. While this procedure is known to run in exponential time in the worst case, the proof actually depends on the existence of queries with an exponential number of answers. But how much of the d