✦ LIBER ✦

Empirical analysis for expert systems

✍ Scribed by W Pedrycz

Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 1988
Tongue: English
Weight: 605 KB
Volume: 27
Category: Article
ISSN: 0165-0114
DOI: 10.1016/0165-0114(88)90070-x

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Empirical analysis for expert systems: V

Empirical analysis for expert systems: Volume 6 in: Research Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Pitman, Boston, 1985, 187 pages, £10.95

✍ M. Ben-Bassat 📂 Article 📅 1987 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 90 KB

Systems analysis techniques for the impl

Systems analysis techniques for the implementation of expert systems

✍ David R Martinez; Marion G Sobol 📂 Article 📅 1988 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 707 KB

Expert systems in trace analysis

✍ F.X. Rius 📂 Article 📅 1993 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 992 KB

## AbStroCt A brief overview of the fundamental principles of knowledge-based systems and their development and usefulness is given. The main differences from conventional computer programs are indicated together with the main advantages and drawbacks. A variety of recent applications of expert sy

Expert systems in chemical analysis

✍ J.A. van Leeuwen; L.M.C. Buydens; B.G.M. Vandeginste; G. Kateman 📂 Article 📅 1990 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 813 KB

Prototypical knowledge for expert system

Prototypical knowledge for expert systems: a retrospective analysis

✍ Jan S. Aikins 📂 Article 📅 1993 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 278 KB

## Two themes The article, "Prototypical knowledge for expert systems" [1 ], published in 1983, was a summarization of my dissertation research at Stanford University in the late 1970s. This was the era of the first rule-based expert systems--MYCIN, Meta-DENDRAL, PUFF, and others from Stanford, an

Expert testimony and jury decision makin

Expert testimony and jury decision making: An empirical analysis

✍ Dr. Brian L. Cutler; Hedy R. Dexter; Steven D. Penrod 📂 Article 📅 1989 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 681 KB

This experiment examines the infruence of expert psychological testimony on juror decision making in eyewitness ident@cation cases. Experienced jurors and undeqraduate mock jurors viewed versions of a videotaped trial, rated the credibility of the eyewitness and the strength of the prosecution's and