Jerry Feldman's paper [5] is to be welcomed in seeking to link linguistic compositional semantics to some form of nonlinguistic conceptual composition. In fact, I'd like to press the question, and ask why concepts are compositional, and what it is that allows human conceptual compositionality to sup
Embodied language, best-fit analysis, and formal compositionality
✍ Scribed by Jerome Feldman
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 2010
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 713 KB
- Volume
- 7
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1571-0645
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
This review brings together two fundamental, but unreconciled, aspects of human language: embodiment and compositionality. One major scientific advance in recent decades has been Embodiment -the realization that scientific understanding of mind and language entails detailed modeling of the human brain and how it evolved to control a physical body in a social community.
The ability to learn and use language is one of the most characteristically human traits. Many animals signal, but only people can express and understand an essentially unbounded range of messages. The technical term for the ability of human language to support all these messages from a few dozen alphabetic symbols is Compositionality.
Rigor is essential for the advancement of any science, but there has been essentially no overlap between efforts to formalize language compositionality and the manifest embodiment of thought. Recent developments suggest that it is feasible to formalize the compositionality of embodied language, but that this requires a focus on conceptual composition and better understanding of contextual best-fit.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
In his paper on Embodied Language, Jerome Feldman [1] puts his finger on the right spot. He points out that Embodied Cognition has been a major advance in recent research on mind and brain but that the way this new paradigm has been explored so far exhibits a major flaw. Embodied cognition takes int