The Nernstian approach to the description of the metal/electrolyte interface is compared with descriptions based on the surface complexation models. Differences are from the assumptions made about the dependence of chemical potential of the potential determining ions (p.d.i.) at the solid surface on
Electrokinetics of the oxide—solution interface
✍ Scribed by A.L Smith
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1976
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 373 KB
- Volume
- 55
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0021-9797
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
The site densities of the surface of different oxides and hydroxides have been calculated from crystallographic data. The following values for the common habits are recommended: 2.7 nm-2 (Corundum), 2.3 nm-2 (Boehmite and Gibbsite), 2.2 nm-2 (Hematite and Rutile), 2.1 nm-2 (Lepidocrokite), 1.9 nm-2
where the complexed solutes represented in Eq. [1] are cat-Simultaneous solution of the Gibbs-Lewis thermodynamic ions, M m , anions, A a , nonionics, U 0 , protons, H / , and hyequations for equilibrium proton and cation complexation at the droxide ions, OH 0 . ## solution-metal oxide interface re