In this paper, we present optimal \(O(\log n)\) time, \(O(n / \log n)\) processor EREW PRAM parallel algorithms for finding the connected components, cut vertices, and bridges of a permutation graph. We also present an \(O(\log n)\) time, \(O(n)\) processor, CREW PRAM model parallel algorithm for fi
Efficient parallel algorithms for bipartite permutation graphs
β Scribed by Lin Chen; Yaacov Yesha
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1993
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 858 KB
- Volume
- 23
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0028-3045
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Abstract
In this paper, we further study the properties of bipartite permutation graphs. We give first efficient parallel algorithms for several problems on bipartite permutation graphs. These problems include transforming a bipartite graph into a strongly ordered one if it is also a permutation graph; testing isomorphism; finding a Hamiltonian path/cycle; solving a variant of the crossing number problem; and others. All these problems can be solved in O(log^2^n) time with O(n^3^) processors on a Common CRCW PRAM. We also show that the minimum fillβin problem for bipartite permutation graphs can be solved efficiently by a randomized parallel algorithm. Β© 1993 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
We present an optimal parallel algorithm for the single-source shortest path problem for permutation graphs. The algorithm runs in \(O(\log n)\) time using \(O(n / \log n)\) processors on an EREW PRAM. As an application, we show that a minimum connected dominating set in a permutation graph can be f
A maximal bipartite set (MBS) in an undirected graph \(G=(V, E)\) is a maximal collection of vertices \(B \subseteq V\) whose induced subgraph is bipartite. In this paper we present efficient sequential (linear time) and parallel (NC) algorithms for constructing an MBS. 1.1993 Acatemic Press, Inc
We present an efficient parallel algorithm for the tree-decomposition problem Ε½ 3 . Ε½. for fixed width w. The algorithm runs in time O O log n and uses O O n processors on an ARBITRARY CRCW PRAM. The sequential complexity of our tree-decom-Ε½ 2 . position algorithm is O O n log n . The tree-decomposi