𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Efficacy of ifosfamide and doxorubicin given as a phase II ?window? in children with newly diagnosed metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma: A report from the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Group

✍ Scribed by Sandler, E. ;Lyden, E. ;Ruymann, F. ;Maurer, H. ;Wharam, M. ;Parham, D. ;Link, M. ;Crist, W.


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2001
Tongue
English
Weight
146 KB
Volume
37
Category
Article
ISSN
0098-1532

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Background

The cure rate for children/adolescents with localized rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) has tripled over the past 25 years, but patients with metastatic disease at presentation have not benefited similarly, and urgently need new therapy. We evaluated a new drug pair, ifosfamide + doxorubicin, for such patients.

Procedure

We estimated the complete and partial response rates (i.e., CR and PR) of 152 previously untreated children/adolescents with metastatic RMS entered on the IRS‐IV pilot from July 1988 to October 1991 who received an “up‐front window” of ifosfamide (1.8 gm/m^2^/day for 5 days) and doxorubicin (30 mg/m^2^/day for 2 days) given every 3 weeks for 12 weeks. This was followed by combination chemotherapy with vincristine, actinomycin D, and cyclophosphamide (VAC), given every 3 weeks for an additional 36 weeks.

Results

Of 115 patients evaluable for early response at 12 weeks, 28 (20%) had CR and 66 (43%) had PR. The ultimate CR rate was 52%. Overall, about one‐third of patients survived. Prognostic factor analysis revealed that patients < 10 years old (P < 0.001), those with embryonal tumors (P = 0.002), or a GU primary site (P = 0.010), and those who lacked nodal disease (P = 0.041), and those who lacked bone or bone marrow metastasis (P < 0.001) fared better than did others.

Conclusions

The 63% CR + PR rate achieved at 12 weeks and overall 5‐year FFS seen with this drug pair is similar to that achieved with previously evaluated drug combinations. We conclude that ifosfamide/doxorubicin is highly active in advanced RMS, and should be considered for inclusion in frontline therapy for children with intermediate or high‐risk RMS. Med Pediatr Oncol 2001;37:442–448. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES