Efficacy of disopyramide and mexiletine used alone or in combination in the treatment of ventricular premature beats
β Scribed by Harumizu Sakurada; Takeshi Motomiya; Masayasu Hiraoka
- Publisher
- Springer US
- Year
- 1991
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 548 KB
- Volume
- 5
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0920-3206
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
The efficacy of oral disopyramide and mexiletine used alone or in combination was studied in 75 patients with frequent ventricular premature beats (VPBs). The efficacy was evaluated with 24-hour ambulatory ECG and > 75% reduction in the number of VPBs was defined as effective. When disopyramide or mexiletine were ineffective or not tolerated, the alternative drug was administered and the efficacy was again evaluated. If the single administration of nei. ther drug was effective, the combination of disopyramide and mexiletine was then given. Either disopyramide or mexiletine was effective in 48 patients, and neither drug was effective in 19 patients. In 19 patients unresponsive to both drugs, combination therapy was effective in six patients (32%). Both drugs caused side effects or one drug caused side effects and another drug was ineffective in eight patients. In five out of those patients, we attempted combined therapy with a reduced dosage of those drugs that caused side effects. This therapy was effective in two patients without intolerable side effects. Thus, when the single use of neither disopyramide nor mexiletine single-drug therapy is effective, it is worthwhile to try combination therapy. Also, combination therapy with a reduced dosage of the drugs that caused side effects might be the therapy of choice in patients who have developed dose-dependent side effects.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract ## BACKGROUND The first analysis of the ATAC (Arimidex, Tamoxifen Alone or in Combination) trial (median followβup, 33 months) demonstrated that in adjuvant endocrine therapy for postmenopausal patients with earlyβstage breast cancer, anastrozole was superior to tamoxifen in terms of d
417 patients suffering from intestinal amoebiasis were randomly allocated to 6 different treatment groups in a controlled study in 3 District Hospitals in Kenya. The patients received either aminosidine (A), etophamide (E), nimorazole (N), or the combinations NA, NE, EA. Treatment in all cases was g