Effects of treatments in clinical trials: Surgery
✍ Scribed by Dr. Thorkild I. A. Sørensen
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1993
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 309 KB
- Volume
- 53
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0022-4790
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
The results of surgery for liver cancer (resection or transplantion) have so far been evaluated against older retrospective reports of the survival of series of patients left untreated. Even though it has been taken for granted that "surgical therapy offers the only chance of cure," the validity of this comparison may be challenged. The key problem is that it is impossible from the available evidence to calculate with any reasonable accuracy the expected distribution of survival times of the patients undergoing surgery had they not been treated. Even though there is a group of surgically treated patients who remain alive without signs of recurrence for 5 years or more, the current strategy for surgical treatment may not be favorable for the patient group as a whole. Despite the forseeable difficulties, it seems timely to encourage randomized trials to obtain a proper evaluation of this treatment.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
Practice in the analysis of clinical trials with continuously measured endpoints is to focus on the di!erence or percentage change in mean or median response. However, treatments may have e!ects on the distribution of responses other than on the average response. We sought an approach to such genera
## Abstract ## Background ‘Prehabilitation’ is an intervention to enhance functional capacity in anticipation of a forthcoming physiological stressor. In patients scheduled for colorectal surgery, the extent to which a structured prehabilitation regimen of stationary cycling and strengthening opti