The standard liver volume (LV) of a recipient is estimated in liver transplantation to determine the minimum LV necessary for the recipient. Simple linear formulas of LV estimation were developed for the Japanese and Caucasian populations. The present study examined the applicability of the reported
Effects of the liver volume and donor steatosis on errors in the estimated standard liver volume
β Scribed by Rohan Chaminda Siriwardana; See Ching Chan; Kenneth Siu Ho Chok; Chung Mau Lo; Sheung Tat Fan
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2011
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 515 KB
- Volume
- 17
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1527-6465
- DOI
- 10.1002/lt.22430
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
An accurate assessment of donor and recipient liver volumes is essential in living donor liver transplantation. Many liver donors are affected by mild to moderate steatosis, and steatotic livers are known to have larger volumes. This study analyzes errors in liver volume estimation by commonly used formulas and the effects of donor steatosis on these errors. Three hundred twenty-five Asian donors who underwent right lobe donor hepatectomy were the subjects of this study. The percentage differences between the liver volumes from computed tomography (CT) and the liver volumes estimated with each formula (ie, the error percentages) were calculated. Five popular formulas were tested. The degrees of steatosis were categorized as follows: no steatosis [n ΒΌ 178 (54.8%)], 10% steatosis [n ΒΌ 128 (39.4%)], and >10% to 20% steatosis [n ΒΌ 19 (5.8%)]. The median errors ranged from 0.6% (7 mL) to 24.6% (360 mL). The lowest was seen with the locally derived formula. All the formulas showed a significant association between the error percentage and the CT liver volume (P < 0.001). Overestimation was seen with smaller liver volumes, whereas underestimation was seen with larger volumes. The locally derived formula was most accurate when the liver volume was 1001 to 1250 mL. A multivariate analysis showed that the estimation error was dependent on the liver volume (P ΒΌ 0.001) and the anthropometric measurement that was used in the calculation (P < 0.001) rather than steatosis (P ! 0.07). In conclusion, all the formulas have a similar pattern of error that is possibly related to the anthropometric measurement. Clinicians should be aware of this pattern of error and the liver volume with which their formula is most accurate.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Hepatic steatosis is often associated with overweight, so we tried body-weight reduction in potential living donors with fatty liver and/or obesity to alleviate hepatic steatosis. We advised to reducing the body weight by 5% for 9 potential living donors showing hepatic steatosis of 25 -95% on initi
Living liver donation is a successful treatment for patients with end-stage liver disease. Most adults are provided with a right lobe graft to ensure a generous recipient liver volume. Some centers are re-exploring the use of smaller left lobe grafts to potentially reduce the donor risk. However, th
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the slice thickness and the calculated volume in computed tomography (CT) liver volumetry through the comparison of the results from images [including 3-dimensional (3D) images] with various slice thicknesses. Twenty potential adult
In living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), obtaining the precise volume of the graft is very important to decrease volumerelated postoperative complications, especially in cases with suspected small-for size grafts. We used stereology based on the Cavalieri method (CM), a new method to measure li
Departments of Medicirzc ((A ricrtric 5 ) Clinic a1 Pharnincoloq~ trtid Hadlolog\. Clniuer\itj of Neiccastle Upon Tyne, ## Neulcmtle lfpon T\ nc I 'nif<>d Kingdom The aim of this study was to determine the effect of aging upon liver volume and apparent liver blood flow in healthy man. Sixty-five