𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Effects of the Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981 on futures market volume

✍ Scribed by Kandice H. Kahl


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1985
Tongue
English
Weight
545 KB
Volume
5
Category
Article
ISSN
0270-7314

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


he Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981 (hereinafter called the Act) significantly T changed the taxation of profits' on futures contracts which were not hedges.'

In this article, the methods of taxation of such profits before and after the Act are reviewed. Because the Act changed the incentives for trading in different contract months, one would expect the distribution of volume among contract months to have changed after the Act. The results in this article indicate that there has been a significant change in the distribution of volume for some commodities which might be attributable to the tax legislation.

TAX ENVIRONMENT BEFORE THE ACT3

Before the Act, profits on futures contracts which were not hedges were taxed in the year in which the futures contract was liquidated. If the taxpayer took delivery on a futures contract, the total profits were taxed in the year in which the delivered property was sold. Taxpayers conducting cash-and-carry transactions were allowed to deduct those costs incurred in holding the physical commodity in the year in which the costs were i n ~u r r e d . ~

Before the Act, profits on a long futures position were taxed as short-term capital 'Throughout this article, the term "profits" is used to denote profits or losses, i.e., profits may be positive or negative.

"The Act specifically states that it does not apply to bonafide hedging transactions. Profits on hedges continue to be taxed as ordinary income.

'For more discussion of the tax environment before and after the Act, see Arthur Andersen (1982, 1984), Bowers (1981, 1982), Goldfein and Hochberg (1968), and Straws.

Typically in a cash-and-carry transaction, an individual holds a spread position, i.e., a long position in one contract month and a short position in a more deferred contract month. The individual takes delivery on the long position, finances the physical commodity, and delivers the commodity against the short position. An individual may also conduct a cash-and-carry transaction by acquiring the physical commodity in the cash market. holding a short futures position, and delivering the commodity at contract maturity.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Comments on β€œthe economics of hedging an
✍ Anne E. Peck πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1981 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 200 KB

choles' paper begins with the assertion that hedging and spreading are S economically identical activities. While not common trade use of these terms, what is meant is that both hedging and spreading are arbitrages, recognizing that what is being arbitraged is very different in each case. By the con

The effects of margins on trading in fut
✍ Raymond P. H. Fishe; Lawrence G. Goldberg πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1986 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 673 KB

ndividuals trading in futures markets are required to post security deposits, I called margins, to insure that brokers and exchanges are potected from nonperformance due to unfavorable price movements. Specified in dollar amounts per contract, margins may be posted in either cash or interest-bearing

A note on the effects of the initiation
✍ Francis E. Laatsch πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1991 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 310 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

he effects of stock index futures trading on returns of the index component T stocks (and on stocks in general) is of concern to market participants, regulators, and academics. Harris (1989) demonstrates that following the introduction of futures trading, the volatility of the S&P 500 component stoc