B ased on a very small subsample of 25 estrogen receptor (ER)- negative women with breast cancer, 13 of whom received group therapy, Spiegel et al. 1 conducted an exploratory analysis that found increased survival for these women. They have argued that these women were not protected by hormonal ther
Effects of supportive-expressive group therapy on survival of patients with metastatic breast cancer : A randomized prospective trial
✍ Scribed by David Spiegel; Lisa D. Butler; Janine Giese-Davis; Cheryl Koopman; Elaine Miller; Sue DiMiceli; Catherine C. Classen; Patricia Fobair; Robert W. Carlson; Helena C. Kraemer
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2007
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 244 KB
- Volume
- 110
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0008-543X
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
BACKGROUND.
This study was designed to replicate our earlier finding that intensive group therapy extended survival time of women with metastatic breast cancer. Subsequent findings concerning the question of whether such psychosocial support affects survival have been mixed.
METHODS.
One hundred twenty‐five women with confirmed metastatic (n = 122) or locally recurrent (n = 3) breast cancer were randomly assigned either to the supportive‐expressive group therapy condition (n = 64), where they received educational materials plus weekly supportive‐expressive group therapy, or to the control condition (n = 61), where they received only educational materials for a minimum of 1 year. The treatment, 90 minutes once a week, was designed to build new bonds of social support, encourage expression of emotion, deal with fears of dying and death, help restructure life priorities, improve communication with family members and healthcare professionals, and enhance control of pain and anxiety.
RESULTS.
Overall mortality after 14 years was 86%; median survival time was 32.8 months. No overall statistically significant effect of treatment on survival was found for treatment (median, 30.7 months) compared with control (median, 33.3 months) patients, but there was a statistically significant intervention site‐by‐condition interaction. Exploratory moderator analysis to explain that interaction revealed a significant overall interaction between estrogen‐receptor (ER) status and treatment condition (P = .002) such that among the 25 ER‐negative participants, those randomized to treatment survived longer (median, 29.8 months) than ER‐negative controls (median, 9.3 months), whereas the ER‐positive participants showed no treatment effect.
CONCLUSIONS.
The earlier finding that longer survival was associated with supportive‐expressive group therapy was not replicated. Although it is possible that psychosocial effects on survival are relevant to a small subsample of women who are more refractory to current hormonal treatments, further research is required to investigate subgroup differences. Cancer 2007. © 2007 American Cancer Society.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
B ased on a very small subsample of 25 estrogen receptor (ER)- negative women with breast cancer, 13 of whom received group therapy, Spiegel et al. 1 conducted an exploratory analysis that found increased survival for these women. They have argued that these women were not protected by hormonal ther
In order to test the effect of a psychological intervention on survival from cancer, 66 women with metastatic breast cancer, all receiving standard medical care, were randomly assigned into two groups; one group (n = 30) attended the psychological intervention, consisting of 35 weekly, 2 h sessions
We have recently reported the psychological outcome of a group Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT) intervention with patients who had metastatic breast cancer. The data of 92 patients who were retained at the first follow-up assessment revealed short-term improvements on measures of mood and self-este